Global Decarbonisation 3050-0230 Caravel Press 10.17184/eac.9847 2025.003 AI-Based Optimization and Hydrodynamic Performance of Floating Pontoon Breakwaters through Experimental and Numerical Modeling https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0374-4526 RiffatJames ceo@wsset.org https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-1991 SamaeiSeyed Reza samaei@srbiau.ac.ir https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4873-6426 GhahfarokhiMohammad Asadian asadian@srbiau.ac.ir World Society of Sustainable Energy Technologies, Nottingham, NG11 6AA, United Kingdom Department of Marine industries, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 01122025 1 1 26 1 December 2025 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Caravel Press. 2025 This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 licence.

Ensuring effective coastal protection requires not only attenuating incoming wave energy but also preserving the operational reliability of marine infrastructure. This study investigates the hydrodynamic behavior of two pontoon-type floating breakwaters—simple and stepped—through a combined program of new laboratory wave-flume experiments and high-fidelity numerical modeling in ANSYS AQWA. A 1:15 physical model was constructed and tested under regular waves with incident heights of 2.2–3.3 cm and periods of 0.44–0.84 s. The experiments showed that the simple pontoon achieved optimum energy dissipation at shorter wave periods (0.44 s), whereas the stepped configuration performed more efficiently in longer waves (0.84 s). Transmission coefficients (Kt) ranged from 0.2 to 1.5, with the stepped design consistently exhibiting stronger wave-energy reduction. Numerical simulations reproduced the laboratory findings with a maximum deviation of about 8%. To further enhance performance, an artificial-intelligence framework was developed that integrates artificial neural networks (ANNs) for rapid prediction of wave-induced loads, genetic algorithms (GAs) for multi-objective structural optimization, and reinforcement learning (RL) for adaptive real-time control. Together these methods lowered the mean transmission coefficient from 0.52 to 0.40 and improved computational efficiency by 88%. In addition, a prototype digital-twin environment, linked to an IoT sensor network, was established to enable continuous structural monitoring and to support condition-based maintenance. The results highlight the dominant influence of breakwater geometry, draft, and mooring characteristics on hydrodynamic behavior and demonstrate that AI-guided optimization provides a practical, scalable, and cost-effective pathway for designing resilient and low-carbon coastal infrastructure.

 Floating breakwaters Coastal engineering AI Optimization Digital Twin Experimental Validation Akoz, M. S., Cobaner, M., Kirkgoz, M. S., & Oner, A. A. (2011). Prediction of geometrical properties of perfect breaking waves on composite breakwaters. Applied Ocean Research, 33(3), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.03.003 10.1016/j.apor.2011.03.003 Carraro, M., De Vanna, F., Zweiri, F., Benini, E., Heidari, A., & Hadavinia, H. (2022). CFD modeling of wind turbine blades with eroded leading edge. Fluids, 7(9), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7090302 10.3390/fluids7090302 Castiglioni, I., Rundo, L., Codari, M., Di Leo, G., Salvatore, C., Interlenghi, M., Gallivanone, F., Cozzi, A., D’Amico, N. C., & Sardanelli, F. (2021). AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning. Physica Medica, 83, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006 Chen, X., Ma, D., & Liu, R. W. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in maritime transportation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(3), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12030439 10.3390/jmse12030439 Cravero, C., De Domenico, D., & Marsano, D. (2023). The use of uncertainty quantification and numerical optimization to support the design and operation management of air-staging gas recirculation strategies in glass furnaces. Fluids, 8(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8020076 10.3390/fluids8020076 Foteinis, S., Campbell, J. S., & Renforth, P. (2023). Life cycle assessment of coastal enhanced weathering for carbon dioxide removal from air. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(15), 6169–6178. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08633 10.1021/acs.est.2c08633 Gesraha, M. R. (2006). Analysis of π-shaped floating breakwater in oblique waves: I. Impervious rigid wave boards. Applied Ocean Research, 28(5), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2007.01.002 10.1016/j.apor.2007.01.002 Guo, J., Wang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Hydrodynamic performance of a multi-module three-cylinder floating breakwater over reefs: Experimental investigation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(12), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121364 10.3390/jmse9121364 Hales, L. (1981). Floating breakwaters: State-of-the-art literature review. U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Technical Report No. 81-1. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/A DA110692.pdf Hasan, R., McPhillips, L., Warn, G., & Bilec, M. (2024). Life cycle assessment of green–grey coastal flood protection infrastructure: A case study from New Orleans. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 4(2), 025001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578 10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578 Isaacson, M., Baldwin, J., & Bhat, S. (1998). Wave propagation past a pile-restrained floating breakwater. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 8(4), Article ISOPE-98-08-4-265. https://onepetro.org/IJOPE/article-abstract/27061/Wave-Propagation-Past-a-Pile-Restrained-Floating?redirec tedFrom=PDF Issa-Zadeh, S. B., Esteban, M. D., López-Gutiérrez, J.-S., & Garay-Rondero, C. L. (2024). Unveiling the sensitivity analysis of port carbon footprint via power alternative scenarios: A deep dive into the Valencia Port case study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(8), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081290 10.3390/jmse12081290 Jimenez, V. J., Bouhmala, N., & Gausdal, A. H. (2020). Developing a predictive maintenance model for vessel machinery. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 5(4), 358–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2020.03.003 10.1016/j.joes.2020.03.003 Koutandos, E., Prinos, P., & Gironella, X. (2005). Floating breakwaters under regular and irregular wave forcing: Reflection and transmission characteristics. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 43(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2005.9641234 10.1080/00221686.2005.9641234 Kuntoji, G., Rao, M., & Rao, S. (2020). Prediction of wave transmission over submerged reef of tandem breakwater using PSO-SVM and PSO-ANN techniques. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 26(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1482796 10.1080/09715010.2018.1482796 Liang, J.-M., Liu, Y., Chen, Y.-K., & Li, A.-J. (2022). Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics of the box-type floating breakwater with different mooring configurations. Ocean Engineering, 254, 111296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111296 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111296 Liu, Y., Li, H.-J., & Zhu, L. (2016). Bragg reflection of water waves by multiple submerged semi-circular breakwaters. Applied Ocean Research, 56, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.01.008 10.1016/j.apor.2016.01.008 Lyu, X., Trevelyan, J., & Subramanian, S. (2024). A symmetric experimental study of the interaction between waves and a novel symmetric-pontoon floating breakwater with hydrofoil attachments. Symmetry, 16(12), 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121605 10.3390/sym16121605 Mao, P., Chen, C., Chen, X., Zhang, Q., Bao, Y., & Yang, Q. (2024). An innovative design for floating breakwater with multi-objective genetic optimal method. Ocean Engineering, 312(Part 2), 119202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119202 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119202 Peña, E., Ferreras, J., & Sanchez-Tembleque, F. (2011). Experimental study on wave transmission coef-ficient, mooring lines, and module connector forces with different designs of floating breakwaters. Ocean Engineering, 38(10), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.05.005 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.05.005 Qiao, Y., Yin, J., Wang, W., Duarte, F., Yang, J., & Ratti, C. (2023). Survey of deep learning for autonomous surface vehicles in marine environments. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(4), 3678–3701. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3235911 10.1109/TITS.2023.3235911 Rijnsdorp, D. P., Vennell, R., & Almeida, L. P. (2021). Free infragravity waves in the North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 126(12), e2021JC017368. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017368 10.1029/2021JC017368 Rutten, J., de Wit, F., van der Werf, J. J., & Ruessink, G. (2024). Continuous wave measurements collected in intermediate water depth in the North Sea during storm season 2021/2022. Data, 9(5), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/data9050070 10.3390/data9050070 Sanitwong-Na-Ayutthaya, S., Saengsupavanich, C., Ariffin, E. H., Ratnayake, A. S., & Shin Yun, L. (2023). Environmental impacts of shore revetment. Heliyon, 9(9), e19646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023 .e19646 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023 Samaei, S. R., Azarsina, F., & Ghahferokhi, M. A. (2016). Numerical simulation of floating pontoon breakwater with ansYS AQWA software and validation of the results with laboratory data. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, 85, Special Edition, 1487–1499. https://doi.org/10.25518/0037-9565.6194 10.25518/0037-9565.6194 Tsai, C.-M., Lai, Y.-H., Perng, J.-W., Tsui, I.-F., & Chung, Y.-J. (2019). Design and application of an autonomous surface vehicle with an AI-based sensing capability. 2019 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/UT.2019.8734350 10.1109/UT.2019.8734350 Younes, R., & Lafon, P. (2009). Design optimization of floating breakwaters with an interdisciplinary fluid-solid structural problem. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(11), 1732–1743. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-112 10.1139/L09-112 Zhang, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224