SET Proceedings 2978-4387 Caravel Press 10.65582/set.2003.031 2003.031 A comparative sustainability assessment of standard housing blocks in Hong Kong and proposed integer concept tower alternative AmatoAlex aamato1@hkucc.hku.hk FrewerRichard HumphreySteven Dept. of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Davis Langdon and Seah Management Ltd. (HK office), Hong Kong SAR, China 24102003 2 1 978-1-995850-10-8 139 143 © 2003 Copyright WSSET 2003

This study is a comparative assessment of the relative sustainability of three Hong Kong 40-storey residential tower types: a housing authority "standard" Harmony Block (HAB), a private sector housing block (PSB), and the Integer Concept Tower (ICT) (50-year and 75-year life). The ICT is a demonstration project showing how a future residential tower of 40 stories might be designed and built for a more sustainable construction industry in Hong Kong. In this study, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) are combined together to measure two of the three accepted environmental aspects of sustainability: economics and environment; using an internationally recognized methodology specially tailored to Hong Kong construction industry, including the South East Asia Region. According to the result study, the overall energy performance of the ICT lies between the HAB (0.22 MJ/m² CFA/annum/occupant) and the PSB (1.16 MJ/m² CFA/annum/occupant) with 0.95 MJ/m² CFA/annum/occupant over 75-year life, and when amortized over 75-year life its rate per annum is best with 563 MJ/m² CFA/annum (versus 709 for HAB and 750 for PSB). The annual rate per occupant of embodied energy is extremely efficient in the HAB. The ICT is the best performing building type for the waste indicator, over the 50 and 75-year life with respectively 19.45 and 12.51 dm³/m² CFA/annum (against 20.84 for HAB and 23.37 for PSB). The results show that the ITC is the overall best performing building with 129 and 107 CO2 kg/m² CFA/annum over 50 and 75-year life respectively, but the most striking aspect of the results is the predominance of the operational CO2 emissions. Also, the cost indicator appears to mirror the energy results. In this study, the ITC becomes the best performer over all the indicators in the 75-year life assessment, showing the importance of the following three main issues: longevity, allowing for better frame construction flexibility; energy efficiency, minimizing energy consumption and increasing the use of energy from renewable generation sources; and repair and maintenance regime efficiency, which affects the whole life cycle impacts. The Integer Concept Tower is definitely worthy of further investigation.

 Hong Kong life cycle assessment (LCA) life cycle costing (LCC) sustainability 24 to 27 October 2003 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies SET2003 2 Chongqing, China Amato, A. (1996). A Comparative Environmental Appraisal of Alternative Framing Systems for Offices. Oxford Brookes University, U.K. Housing Authority (2002). Management of List: Components & Materials Team. Hong Kong: Author. [On-line]. Available: http://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/dcb/applist/manage6.htm. Howard, N., Edwards, S., & Anderson, J. (1999). BRE Methodology for Environmental Profiles of Construction Materials, Components and Buildings. London: BRE. Chen, T.Y., Burnett, J., & Chau, C.K. (2000, April). Analysis of Embodied Energy Use in the Residential Building of Hong Kong. Energy [on-line journal], 26(4), 323-340. Architectural Services Department, Hong Kong Government (1982). S.D Q.S. Technical Instruction No. 8. Hong Kong: Author. Koenig, A., Kwan, A.K.H, Lee, P.K.K., & Liu, W.F. (2001, May). Building Waste in Hong Kong: Generation and Potential Reuse. Paper presented in the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (Structural Division) and The Institution of Structural Engineers (Hong Kong Division) at the One Day Seminar – "Environmentally Friendly Structures" – Hong Kong.