<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>SET Proceedings</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2978-4387</issn>
      <publisher><publisher-name>Caravel Press</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.65582/set.2005.062</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2005.062</article-id>
      <title-group><article-title>Quantifying the Benefits of Solar Design</article-title></title-group>
    <contrib-group>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Holland</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
      </contrib>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Gillott</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
      </contrib>
      <aff id="aff1">School of the Built Environment, The University of Nottingham, England</aff>
    </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>23</day><month>09</month><year>2005</year></pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <isbn publication-format="electronic">978-7-112-07718-2</isbn>
      <fpage>273</fpage>
      <lpage>279</lpage>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://caravelpress.com/proceedings/set/papers/2005.062"/>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><string-date>23 September 2005</string-date></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2005 Copyright WSSET</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2005</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>It is generally considered by eco-designers that the optimum orientation for a domestic dwelling in a cold temperate climate in the northern hemisphere is with the most heavily glazed façade facing within 30° of south, so that the rooms on that side of the house can make the maximum use of passive solar gain during the heating season. Analysis has been undertaken to quantify the situation for an actual dwelling built in 2004 in Sheffield, England, which features a heavily glazed rear elevation that looks 30° west of north. Eco-designers might expect this to be one of the worst performing orientations for passive solar heating, and so the performance of the design has been evaluated for each of the cardinal and inter-cardinal orientations under three criteria: natural daylighting performance; total solar insolation received and transmitted; and total fabric heat loss for the glazing design. The results are presented in scientific units and also in terms more familiar to UK house-building decision makers; those of BRE EcoPoints and a dwelling's SAP energy rating. Comparison is then made between the predictions of the computational and SAP methodologies, and what the results mean for the eco-designer.</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>daylighting</kwd>
        <kwd>solar gain</kwd>
        <kwd>orientation</kwd>
        <kwd>SAP</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <conference>
        <conf-date>23 to 25 September 2005</conf-date>
        <conf-name>4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies</conf-name>
        <conf-acronym>SET2005</conf-acronym>
        <conf-num>4</conf-num>
        <conf-loc>Jinan, China</conf-loc>
      </conference>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref-r1">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pilkington Activ™ Commercial Brochure. Accessed on 17/06/05 from: http://www.pilkington.com</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r2">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Crisp VHC, Littlefair PJ. 1984 “Average daylight factor prediction”, Proceedings CIBSE National Conference 1984, University of Cambridge. CIBSE, London.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r3">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dr A.Marsh, C. Raines, “Ecotect v5.20”. Accessed on 17/06/05 from: http://www.squ1.com</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r4">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chartered Institute for Building Service Engineers, 1999. “Daylighting and Window Design”, Lighting Guide LG10. CIBSE, London.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r5">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Energy Efficiency Best Practice Program,1998. DETR Good Practice Guide 245: “Desktop Guide to Daylighting – for Architects”.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r6">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Building Research Establishment, Garston, 2004. EcoHomes – The Environmental Rating for Homes: The Guidance 2005, Issue 1.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r7">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ParTake Services Limited. The Home Information Pack (aka Home Seller’s Pack) – Information Resource. Accessed on 17/06/05: http://www.home-information-pack.net/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r8">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Building Research Establishment, Garston, 2004. The Government’s Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating of Dwellings, 2005 Edition, Draft Version 9.80. Accessed on 10/07/05 from: http://projects.bre.co.uk/sap2005/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref-r9">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Calculated using location specific sunset and sunrise times accessed on 17/06/05 from: http://www.sunrisesunset.com</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
