SET Proceedings

2978-4387

Caravel Press

10.65582/set.2007.035

2007.035

Climate, Urban Configuration and Thermal Comfort in Outdoors Spaces. The Case of Mendoza's City, Argentina.

Correa

E. N.

ecorrea@lab.cricyt.edu.ar De Rosa

Lesino

lesino@unsa.edu.ar LAHV- Laboratorio de Ambiente Humano y Vivienda - INCIHUSA- CONICET. Mendoza-Argentina. INENCO - Instituto de Investigaciones en Energías No Convencionales - Universidad Nacional de Salta- CONICET. Salta- Argentina.

05092007

6 1 978-1-995850-09-2 213 219

5 September 2007

2007

This paper attempts to evaluate the thermal behaviour of different configurations of urban spaces that are present in Mendoza's city, with the aim of obtaining a set of guidelines for designing more sustainable environments. To this objective; a set of meteorological data was recorded from sixteen fixed stations located inside the city, over a complete yearly cycle. The sites studied represent different land-use types and its human bioclimatic conditions were evaluated using The Discomfort Index (DI) proposed by Thom, as an indicator suitable for the type of data obtained The mean daily and hourly variations of the DI are given, and its distribution is cartographically presented and analysed. The final goal is to correlate the observed differences in the level of the thermal comfort between the evaluated stations and the differences in the dynamics of urbanization in their environment.

thermal comfort outdoors spaces urban climate urban sustainability

5 to 7 September 2007

6th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies

SET2007

Santiago, Chile

Alvarez, et al; (1992) Control climático en espacios abiertos. Grupo Termotecnia. Dpto. Ing Energética. Universidad Sevilla.

Thom EC. The discomfort index. Weatherwise 1959; 12:57–60.

Correa, et al. (2005). Urban Heat Island Features in the city of Mendoza, Argentina. The Effects of Urban Configuration and the Climatic Conditions. PLEA 2005.Beirut, Lebanon.

Alvarez, A (2000). “La Redefinición Territorial del Área Metropolitana de Mendoza en el Contexto de los actuales procesos de transformación”. Revista GeoNotas. Vol 4. Nº4. Dpto de Geografia - Universidade Estadual de Maringá.

Oke, T.R (1976). “The Distance Between Canopy And Boundary –Layer Urban Heat Island”.Atmosphere.14 (4) 268-277.

Oke, T.R (2004). “Initial Guidance To Obtain Representative Meteorological Observations At Urban Sites”. Iom Report, Td In Press, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.

Deosthali V. Assessment of impact of urbanization on climate: an application of bio-climatic index. Atmospheric Environment 1999;33(24–25):4125–33.

Nieuwolt S. Tropical climatology. London: Wiley; 1977.

Mather, J.R., 1974. Climatology: Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill, USA.

Unger J. Comparisons of urban and rural bioclimatological conditions in the case of a central-European city. International Journal of Biometeorology 1999;43:139–44.

Clarke JF, Bach B. Comparison of the comfort conditions in different urban and suburban micro environments. International Journal of Biometeorology 1971; 15:41–54.

Giles BD, Balafoutis CH. The greek heatwaves of 1987 and 1988. International Journal of Climatology 1990;10:505–17.

Emmanuel R. Thermal comfort implications of urbanization in a warm-humid city:the Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR), Sri Lanka Building and Environment 40 (2005) 1591–1601