SET Proceedings 2978-4387 Caravel Press 10.65582/set.2008.057 2008.057 Potential of Energy Saving for Bioethanol Plant by Polygeneration Integration ZhouWei YangHongxing behxyang@polyu.edu.hk RissanenMarkku NygrenBertil YanJinyue Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong ABB AB, Corporate Research, SE-721 78 Västerås, Sweden Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology/Energy Processes, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Public Technology, Mälardalen University, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden 24082008 7 1 978-1-995850-08-5 436 443 24 August 2008 © 2008 Copyright WSSET 2008

Economic competitiveness of bioethanol production strongly depends on the amount of heat and power consumed during the production process. Integration of different energy conversion processes by polygeneration is one of solutions to maximize the use of energy resources to best meet user’s the energy demands. In this study, biogas generation, fuel cell system and a greenhouse are integrated in the bioethanol plant to form a polygeneration system. Products of the polygeneration system include heat (steam), electric power and by-products (biogas, fertilizer, animal food, etc.). Simulation of the polygeneration system is carried out by Simulink, and the detailed energy flow and mass balances of the whole polygeneration plant were presented. Energy saving potential for the polygeneration plant is analyzed to find the optimum configuration by maximizing electricity production while producing sufficient heat from both the fuel cell system and pellets burning to satisfy the energy requirements of the whole plant. The result showed that for the studied polygeneration plant (84,000 ton/year bioethanol production), 65% of the stillage (60 ton/h) is used for biogas production; the rest is dried out and then burned to generate steam to cover the unsatisfied heat demand. After covering the energy demand of the whole plant, 3.6 MW of electricity can be sold to the grid. Additionally, some by-products can also be generated, such as forest fertilizer.

 Bioethanol Biogas Fuel Cell Energy Saving Polygeneration Energy Integration 24 to 27 August 2008 7th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies SET2008 7 Seoul, Korea Erik Dahlquist, Eva Thorin, Jinyue Yan. Alternative pathways to a fossil-fuel free energy system in the Mälardalen region of Sweden. 3rd International Green Energy Conference. Västerås, Sweden. 2007. Maiorella BL, Blanch HW and Wilke CR. Biotechnology report. Economic evaluation of alternative ethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1984; 26: 1003-1025. Taylor F et al. Dry-grind process for fuel ethanol by continuous fermentation and stripping. Biotechnology Progress 2000; 16: 541-547. Ikegami T et al. Production of high-concentration bioethanol by pervaporation. Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2003; 78(9): 1006-1010. Ikegami T et al. Reliable production of highly concentrated bioethanol by a conjunction of pervaporation using a silicone rubber sheet-covered silicalite membrane with adsorption process. Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2004; 79 (8): 896-901. Chandrakant P and Bisaria VS. Simultaneous bioconversion of cellulose and hemicellulose to ethanol. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 1998; 18(4): 295-331. Gnansounou E, Dauriat A and Wyman CE. Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China. Bioresource Technology 2005; 96: 985-1002. Batchelor SE, Cook P, Booth EJ and Walter KC. Economics of bioethanol production from wheat in the UK. Renewable Energy 1994; 5(5-8): 807-809. Zhang C, Han W, Jing X, Pu G and Wang C. Life cycle economic analysis of fuel ethanol derived from cassava in southwest China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2003; 7: 353-366. Murphy JD and McCarthy K. Ethanol production from energy crops and wastes for use as a transport fuel in Ireland. Applied Energy 2005; 82: 148-166. Li X and Kraslawski A. Conceptual process synthesis: past and current trends. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2004; 43: 589-600. Westerberg AW. A retrospective on design and process synthesis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2004; 28: 447-458. Cardona CA and Sánchez OJ. Energy consumption analysis of integrated flowsheets for production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy 2006; 31(13): 2447-2459. Kaylen M, Van Dyne D, Choi YS and Blase M. Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Bioresource Technology 2000; 72: 19-32. Lin Y and Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2006; 69: 627-642. Pfeffer M, Wukovits W and Friedl A. Optimization of the Energy Demand of Bioethanol Production by Process Integration. Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction. Italy. 2005; 115-120. Maria Werlefors. Modelling and control of an anaerobic digestion process connected to a molten carbonate fuel cell and a greenhouse. Master Thesis, 2006. Rissanen M, Nygren B and Werlefors M. Biofuels and stationary fuel cells. 3rd International Green Energy Conference. Västerås, Sweden. 2007; 430-435. Direct Fuel Cell DFC1500MA application guide. FuelCell Energy, Inc. 2006. Roger Renström. The potential of improvements in the energy systems of sawmills when coupled dryers are used for drying of wood fuels and wood products. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006; 30(5): 452-460.