<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>SET Proceedings</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2978-4387</issn>
      <publisher><publisher-name>Caravel Press</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.65582/set.2015.155</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2015.155</article-id>
      <title-group><article-title>Are batteries the PV energy self-consumption optimisation solution for homes?: Techno-economic comparison of battery and hot water tank storage technologies in the UK</article-title></title-group>
    <contrib-group>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Parra</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        <email>david.parra@unige.ch</email>
      </contrib>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>Gavin S.</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        <email>gavin.walker@nottingham.ac.uk</email>
      </contrib>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Gillott</surname><given-names>Mark</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        <email>mark.gillott@nottingham.ac.uk</email>
      </contrib>
      <aff id="aff1">University of Nottingham, Energy Technologies Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK</aff>
    </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <isbn publication-format="electronic">978-0-85358-315-8</isbn>
      <fpage>68</fpage>
      <lpage>78</lpage>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://caravelpress.com/proceedings/set/papers/2015.155"/>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><string-date>6 July 2016</string-date></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2015 Copyright WSSET</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>Growing support to decarbonise energy systems together with increasing retail energy prices are converting self-generation into a more attractive energy supply option. At the consumption level, solar PV is the most widespread generation technology due to declining capital costs, modularity and easy maintenance. The intrinsic dependence of solar energy generation on weather patterns and conditions affects the performance, final supply to the local demand load (i.e. local self-consumption) and final revenue. Energy storage is an available technological option to increase the value of local PV generation by increasing the self-consumption of PV-generated electricity. Therefore, understanding the performance, cost, value and optimum energy storage technology for managing PV generation is key for current and new customers with rooftop PV installations. In this study, energy storage for single homes is optimised by quantifying the performance, levelised cost, levelised value and profitability of hot water tanks (supplying domestic hot water), lead-acid batteries and lithium-ion batteries (supplying electricity). Although the assumed storage medium cost for Li-ion batteries (350 £/kWh) was 2.5 times higher than that of PbA batteries (140 £/kWh), Li-ion technology’s greater round trip efficiency and cycling capability resulted in lower levelised cost (0.37 £/kWh) and higher levelised value (0.15 £/kWh) than PbA technology. The best economic case was for hot water tanks with a size ranging between 100 l and 200 l which were able to achieve internal rate of return values higher than the assumed discount factor (4%), especially when the property already had a hot water tank and domestic hot water was previously met by using retail electricity.</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>PV</kwd>
        <kwd>battery</kwd>
        <kwd>hot water tank</kwd>
        <kwd>levelised cost</kwd>
        <kwd>internal rate of return</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <conference>
        <conf-date>25 to 27 August 2015</conf-date>
        <conf-name>14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies</conf-name>
        <conf-acronym>SET2015</conf-acronym>
        <conf-num>14</conf-num>
        <conf-loc>Nottingham, United Kingdom</conf-loc>
      </conference>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
  </body>
  <back>
  </back>
</article>
