<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>SET Proceedings</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2978-4387</issn>
      <publisher><publisher-name>Caravel Press</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.65582/set.2017.156</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2017.156</article-id>
      <title-group><article-title>Performance Comparison of thermoelectric generators with Extremum seeking control and incremental conductance MPPT methods</article-title></title-group>
    <contrib-group>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Twaha</surname><given-names>Ssennoga</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
      </contrib>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Jie</given-names></name>
        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
      </contrib>
      <contrib contrib-type="author">
        <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Yuying</given-names></name>
      </contrib>
      <aff id="aff1">Fluids &amp; Thermal Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom</aff>
    </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>13</day><month>07</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <isbn publication-format="electronic">9791220022033</isbn>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>9</lpage>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://caravelpress.com/proceedings/set/papers/2017.156"/>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><string-date>13 July 2017</string-date></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2017 Copyright WSSET</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) are used for converting heat into electricity, environmentally friendly, without moving parts and with less complexity. One of the problems with TEG is that it has low efficiency and therefore it is necessary to harvest maximum power from them to ensure their optimum utilization. Therefore, it is required to use the maximum power trackers (MPPTs) which for long time have demonstrated good performance in photovoltaic systems. The purpose of this work is to compare the performance of Extremum seeking control (ESC) algorithm with a classical incremental conductance (IC) method. Results indicate that ESC outperforms the IC technique in terms of extracting maximum power and the speed of computation. ESC method is faster than the IC method with simulation time of 152.1s and 781.8 s respectively. Moreover ESC is less complex in terms of model implementation than the IC method.</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>Extremum seeking control</kwd>
        <kwd>Incremental conductance</kwd>
        <kwd>Thermoelectric generators</kwd>
        <kwd>MPPT</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <conference>
        <conf-date>17 to 20 July 2017</conf-date>
        <conf-name>16th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies</conf-name>
        <conf-acronym>SET2017</conf-acronym>
        <conf-num>16</conf-num>
        <conf-loc>Bologna, Italy</conf-loc>
      </conference>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
  </body>
  <back>
  </back>
</article>
