Review
Artificial Intelligence for Net-Zero and Climate-Resilient Sustainable Cities: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
, , ,
1School of Technology and Research, Dnyaan Prasad Global University, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra 411018, India
* Correspondence: Rakesh A. Afre, [email protected]
- Published
- 15 October 2026
- Pages
- 221-252
- Received
- 22 July 2026
- Revised
- 9 October 2026
- Accepted
- 14 October 2026
- Access
- Open access, CC BY 4.0
Abstract
Keywords. Artificial Intelligence; Sustainable Cities; Net-Zero Cities; Climate Resilience; Smart Infrastructure; Digital Twins; Smart Urban Systems
1. Introduction
Rapid urbanization and industrial development have created significant challenges for cities across the world. Increasing population growth, high energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions, traffic congestion, waste generation, and climate-related disasters are placing enormous pressure on urban infrastructure and natural resources. According to the United Nations, more than half of the global population currently lives in urban areas, and this percentage is expected to increase further in the coming decades. Cities are also responsible for nearly 70% of global carbon dioxide emissions and consume a major share of the world’s energy resources. Therefore, developing sustainable, resilient, and low-carbon urban systems has become one of the most important global priorities (El-Agamy et al. 2024). Climate change has further intensified urban challenges through rising temperatures, floods, droughts, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events. Many cities are increasingly vulnerable to environmental risks that affect transportation systems, energy infrastructure, water resources, public health, and economic activities. As a result, governments and policymakers worldwide are promoting the development of net-zero and climate-resilient cities to reduce environmental impacts and improve urban sustainability. Net-zero cities aim to balance greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy integration, sustainable transportation, and smart resource management, while climate-resilient cities focus on adapting urban systems to withstand climate-related risks and disasters (Mondal et al. 2024; Mylonas et al. 2021).
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology with significant potential to support sustainable urban development. AI methods, including machine learning and deep learning, are increasingly integrated with enabling technologies such as the Internet of Things, cloud computing and digital twins to support urban monitoring, prediction and decision-making. AI can process large volumes of urban data in real time and provide intelligent solutions for energy optimization, traffic management, environmental monitoring, infrastructure maintenance, disaster prediction, and urban planning (Olawade et al. 2024; Ramu et al. 2022). AI-driven technologies are playing an important role in reducing carbon emissions and improving energy efficiency in cities. Smart grids combined with AI can optimize electricity distribution, balance renewable energy supply and demand, and reduce energy waste. AI-based building management systems can improve heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and lighting efficiency, leading to lower energy consumption and reduced operational costs. Similarly, intelligent transportation systems can optimize traffic flow, reduce fuel consumption, support electric vehicle integration, and decrease urban air pollution (Pan 2025; Sacoto-Cabrera et al. 2025; Stephen et al. 2025). AI is also becoming increasingly important in climate resilience and environmental monitoring. Advanced AI models can predict floods, heat waves, storms, and other extreme weather events using real-time environmental and satellite data. These technologies can support disaster preparedness, emergency response, and risk management in vulnerable urban regions. In addition, AI-enabled environmental monitoring systems can track air quality, water quality, urban heat islands, and carbon emissions, helping governments and urban planners develop effective sustainability strategies (Pan 2025; Yahia et al. 2025; Xu et al. 2024).
Another rapidly growing area is the use of AI-powered digital twins in smart city development. Digital twins are virtual models of physical urban systems that can simulate city operations, infrastructure performance, and environmental conditions in real time. When integrated with AI and IoT technologies, digital twins can help policymakers analyze urban scenarios, optimize infrastructure management, and improve urban resilience. AI-enabled digital platforms also support data-driven governance, citizen engagement, and efficient public service delivery in modern smart cities (Yahia et al. 2025; Sachdeva et al. 2021; Gupta and Degbelo 2022; Kyriaki et al. 2025; Ma et al. 2024). Despite the growing benefits of AI in sustainable urban systems, several important challenges still exist. AI technologies require large volumes of high-quality data, advanced computational infrastructure, and significant energy consumption. Concerns related to data privacy, cybersecurity, algorithmic bias, ethical governance, and social inequality remain major barriers to large-scale AI adoption in cities (Ali et al. 2025; O’Dwyer et al. 2019; Nikpour et al. 2023). In many developing countries, limited technological infrastructure, lack of skilled professionals, and insufficient policy frameworks further restrict the implementation of AI-driven urban solutions (Olawade et al. 2024; Srivastava and Maity 2023).
Previous reviews provide important foundations for understanding the role of digital technologies in sustainable urban development. Bibri et al. (2024b) examined the integration of artificial intelligence, the artificial intelligence of things and urban digital twins for data-driven environmental planning. Mazzetto (2024) reviewed urban digital twin integration, applications, implementation challenges and future directions in smart city development. These contributions address substantial parts of the relationship between digital technologies and urban sustainability. Building on this work, the present review adopts a cross-sector perspective centred on two connected objectives: reducing urban greenhouse gas emissions and strengthening resilience to climate-related hazards. Its guiding question is how the reported performance of AI applications relates to these objectives, and what technical, environmental and institutional conditions influence their practical value.
In this review, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions refers to a balance between human-caused greenhouse gas emissions and removals over a specified period, using a stated metric to express the gases as CO₂ equivalents. Carbon neutrality refers specifically to balancing CO₂ emissions and removals. At the global scale, carbon neutrality is equivalent to net-zero CO₂ emissions; at the city or organizational scale, neutrality claims may include compensation beyond the entity’s boundary. The gases covered, accounting boundary, reporting period, and treatment of removals or offsets must therefore be stated. Climate resilience refers to the capacity of urban social, ecological, and infrastructure systems to cope with climate-related disturbances, maintain essential functions, and adapt or reorganize as conditions change (IPCC 2022; IPCC 2023).
The contribution of this review is to bring AI applications in energy, transportation, environmental monitoring, infrastructure and urban governance into a common analytical discussion of climate mitigation and adaptation. The analysis distinguishes improvements in prediction or operational efficiency from evidence of emissions reduction or improved resilience. It also considers how data quality, transferability between cities, computational resource use, cybersecurity and governance affect the interpretation and implementation of reported benefits. Digital twins are examined as platforms that can support AI-enabled monitoring, simulation and decision-making within this wider urban context. Through this approach, the review aims to identify where evidence supports practical applications, where benefits remain conditional, and which research priorities are needed to strengthen future evaluations.
2. Review approach and limitations
2.1. Literature identification and scope
This article adopts a narrative review approach to examine artificial intelligence applications relevant to net-zero and climate-resilient cities. Literature was identified through Google Scholar and ScienceDirect (Elsevier). The review covers AI applications in urban energy systems, transportation, environmental monitoring, infrastructure, digital twins and governance. Its purpose is to discuss these applications in relation to climate mitigation and adaptation, together with the challenges affecting their practical implementation.
2.2. Organisation of the discussion
The literature is organised thematically by urban application area. The discussion considers the AI approaches described in the cited publications, their intended applications, reported benefits and limitations. Technical issues are considered alongside environmental, ethical and governance concerns.
This thematic organisation provides a basis for comparing applications across sectors. Findings from individual publications are considered within their reported settings and methods. Improvements in prediction accuracy or operational performance are not, by themselves, treated as evidence of reduced greenhouse gas emissions or improved climate resilience.
2.3. Methodological limitations
A complete search and screening register was not retained. Consequently, the exact search histories, database-specific retrieval counts, duplicate-removal records and full-text exclusion decisions cannot be reported reliably. The article therefore does not claim a reproducible systematic search or exhaustive coverage of the literature, and no verified study-selection counts are presented.
The narrative approach is subject to selection bias, and relevant publications may have been omitted. Differences in study settings, methods, evaluation metrics and implementation conditions also limit direct comparisons. The conclusions should therefore be interpreted as a qualitative discussion of the cited literature rather than a comprehensive assessment of all available evidence.
3. AI technologies for sustainable cities
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are becoming important tools for improving the sustainability, efficiency, and resilience of modern cities. Rapid urbanization, increasing energy demand, traffic congestion, environmental pollution, and climate change have encouraged governments and researchers to adopt intelligent digital technologies for better urban management. AI technologies can analyze large volumes of urban data, support real-time decision-making, automate complex systems, and improve resource efficiency in smart cities (Bibri et al. 2024a; Tingzon et al. 2025; Varzeshi et al. 2026). Several advanced technologies such as machine learning, deep learning, Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, cloud computing, and digital twins are widely used in sustainable urban systems. These technologies help cities improve energy management, transportation systems, environmental monitoring, infrastructure maintenance, and urban planning. The integration of AI with smart infrastructure is also supporting the transition toward net-zero and climate-resilient cities (Yessef et al. 2025; van Deursen and van Dijk 2018; Sebastian 2024).
The overall AI ecosystem for sustainable cities is represented in Figure 1. Urban data generated from IoT sensors, smart meters, satellite observations, geographic information systems (GIS), and other digital platforms are integrated through cloud and edge computing infrastructures. AI technologies, including machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, and natural language processing, analyze these data to support applications such as smart energy management, sustainable transportation, environmental monitoring, infrastructure management, water and waste management, disaster risk reduction, and urban planning. Smart governance and digital twin platforms further enable real-time monitoring, policy evaluation, simulation, and citizen engagement. Together, these components contribute to reduced carbon emissions, improved resource efficiency, enhanced climate resilience, and better quality of life, supporting the development of net-zero and sustainable cities (Seidu et al. 2025; Sanusi 2025; Vishwakarma et al. 2025).
3.1. Machine learning and deep learning
Machine learning (ML) is one of the most widely used branches of artificial intelligence in sustainable city applications. ML algorithms can learn from historical and real-time data to identify patterns, make predictions, and optimize urban operations. Deep learning, a more advanced form of machine learning based on artificial neural networks, can process large and complex datasets with high accuracy. Smart energy systems combine forecasting, optimization, and control to coordinate energy supply and demand (O’Dwyer et al. 2019). In transportation, machine learning can support prediction and decision-making alongside simulation and optimization methods (de la Torre et al. 2021). The environmental benefits of these applications depend on their implementation and should be assessed using appropriate operational and emissions indicators. AI-based models can analyze weather conditions, occupancy patterns, and energy consumption behavior to reduce energy waste and improve efficiency. Deep learning models are also applied in traffic management systems to predict traffic congestion, optimize signal timing, and reduce fuel consumption and carbon emissions (Elghaish et al. 2024; Stephen et al. 2025). In environmental applications, machine learning can support air quality monitoring, flood prediction, climate modeling, and disaster risk analysis. AI-based predictive systems help urban authorities make faster and more accurate decisions during extreme weather events and environmental emergencies. In addition, deep learning techniques are increasingly used in image recognition and remote sensing applications for monitoring urban growth, land-use changes, and infrastructure conditions. ML also plays an important role in predictive maintenance of urban infrastructure. AI systems can continuously monitor bridges, roads, pipelines, and buildings using sensor data to identify faults before major failures occur. This reduces maintenance costs, improves public safety, and extends infrastructure lifespan (Ma et al. 2024; He and Prasad 2024).
3.2. Internet of Things (IoT) and smart sensors
The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to interconnected devices and sensors that collect and exchange data through communication networks. IoT is a key component of smart city infrastructure because it enables real-time monitoring and management of urban systems. Smart sensors are widely used in transportation systems, energy grids, water management, waste collection, environmental monitoring, and public safety applications. These sensors continuously collect data related to traffic flow, air quality, temperature, humidity, noise levels, energy consumption, and infrastructure conditions. The collected data are then analyzed using AI algorithms to improve urban efficiency and sustainability (Ramu et al. 2022; Huzzat et al. 2025). For example, IoT-enabled smart grids can monitor electricity demand and optimize energy distribution in real time. Similarly, smart transportation systems use sensors and AI technologies to manage traffic flow, reduce congestion, and improve public transportation efficiency. IoT-based waste management systems can optimize waste collection routes and reduce fuel consumption. Environmental monitoring is another important application of IoT technologies in sustainable cities. Smart sensors can monitor urban heat islands, water quality, carbon emissions, and air pollution levels continuously. These systems help governments and urban planners develop effective environmental protection and climate adaptation strategies. The combination of AI and IoT is often called Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), where AI technologies analyze sensor data and automate decision-making processes. AIoT systems are becoming increasingly important in the development of intelligent and autonomous urban infrastructure (Sacoto-Cabrera et al. 2025; Huzzat et al. 2025; Meng and Zhu 2024).
Table 1. AI methods, application areas, and enabling technologies for sustainable urban systems
| Category | Method, field, or technology | Main role | Illustrative urban applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI methods | Machine learning | Learns patterns for prediction and decision support; examples include random forests, support vector machines, and gradient boosting | Energy-demand forecasting, traffic prediction, predictive maintenance |
| AI methods | Deep learning | Uses multilayer neural networks; examples include CNNs, LSTMs, and transformers | Remote-sensing analysis, infrastructure inspection, environmental forecasting |
| AI methods | Generative AI | Generates content or candidate designs using learned patterns; examples include large language models and diffusion models | Planning alternatives, document assistance, synthetic-data generation |
| AI application areas | Computer vision | Extracts information from images and video, often using machine learning | Traffic observation, damage detection, land-use mapping |
| AI application areas | Natural language processing | Processes text and language, often using machine learning | Policy-document analysis, citizen-feedback analysis, emergency communication |
| Analytical and optimization methods | Mathematical optimization and metaheuristics | Supports decisions under objectives and constraints; includes linear programming, genetic algorithms, and particle swarm optimization | Building control, EV charging, logistics, resource allocation |
| Analytical approaches | Big-data analytics | Analyzes large datasets using statistical, computational, and sometimes AI methods | Mobility analysis, environmental monitoring, urban-service planning |
| Enabling infrastructure | Internet of Things | Collects and transmits data through connected sensors and devices | Monitoring of buildings, grids, water networks, and environmental conditions |
| Computing infrastructure | Cloud computing | Provides remote computing and storage resources | Model training, data integration, city-scale analytical platforms |
| Computing infrastructure | Edge computing | Processes data near its source | Local monitoring, rapid control, reduced communication latency |
| Modeling and integration platforms | Digital twins | Links digital representations with observations of physical systems; may incorporate simulation and AI | Infrastructure monitoring, scenario evaluation, adaptation planning |
Table 1 summarizes the AI methods, application areas, and enabling technologies that support sustainable urban development, with the main role of each and illustrative urban applications. Together, these technologies provide the foundation for intelligent urban management by enabling data-driven decision-making, efficient resource utilization, climate adaptation, infrastructure optimization, and sustainable public services.
3.3. Big data analytics and cloud computing
Modern cities generate enormous amounts of data from sensors, communication systems, satellites, transportation networks, and public services. Managing and analyzing these large datasets require advanced big data analytics and cloud computing technologies. Big data analytics helps process structured and unstructured urban data to identify trends, optimize operations, and support urban decision-making. AI-based data analytics systems can improve energy efficiency, transportation planning, healthcare management, public safety, and emergency response systems. Cloud computing provides scalable storage and computing infrastructure for managing smart city data and AI applications. Cloud platforms allow urban authorities to process large datasets efficiently without requiring expensive local computing systems. Cloud-based AI systems also support real-time monitoring and control of urban infrastructure. The integration of AI, big data, and cloud computing enables cities to develop intelligent urban management platforms capable of handling complex urban challenges. These technologies improve operational efficiency, reduce resource waste, and support sustainable development goals (Sacoto-Cabrera et al. 2025; Mousavi et al. 2024; Sepasgozar 2021).
3.4. Digital twins and intelligent urban platforms
Digital twin technology is rapidly emerging as one of the most important technologies for sustainable cities. A digital twin is a virtual model or digital replica of a physical object, system, or urban environment that continuously receives real-time data from sensors and connected devices. Digital twins can simulate the behavior and performance of urban infrastructure, transportation systems, buildings, and energy networks. When integrated with AI and IoT technologies, digital twins help urban planners and decision-makers analyze different urban scenarios, optimize infrastructure management, and improve climate resilience (El-Agamy et al. 2024; Huzzat et al. 2025; Dembski et al. 2020).
AI-enabled digital twins are increasingly used in:
- smart transportation systems,
- energy management,
- disaster preparedness,
- water resource management,
- environmental monitoring,
- infrastructure maintenance.
For example, digital twins can simulate flooding conditions in urban areas and help authorities prepare emergency response strategies. They can also optimize building energy performance and reduce carbon emissions through real-time monitoring and predictive analysis (Kyriaki et al. 2025; Simionescu and Strielkowski 2025). Several cities such as Singapore, Amsterdam, and Dubai are actively adopting digital twin technologies for sustainable urban planning and resilience improvement (Ali et al. 2025). The integration of federated learning with digital twins is also gaining attention because it improves data privacy and secure data sharing across urban systems. Federated learning allows AI models to learn from distributed data sources without directly transferring sensitive information, which is important for smart city governance and cybersecurity (Ramu et al. 2022; Sadri et al. 2023; Dembski et al. 2020).
3.5. Generative AI and emerging technologies
Generative AI is an emerging branch of artificial intelligence that can create text, images, simulations, code, and predictive models. Recent developments in large language models and generative AI systems are opening new opportunities for sustainable urban planning and smart governance. Generative AI can support urban planners by automatically generating urban design alternatives, infrastructure layouts, transportation scenarios, and sustainability strategies. These technologies can also assist in citizen communication, policy analysis, and urban data interpretation. In digital twin systems, generative AI can help create synthetic urban datasets, simulate future urban conditions, and improve predictive urban modeling. Researchers are increasingly exploring the integration of generative AI with smart city platforms to support automated urban management and intelligent decision-making (Xu et al. 2024; Kyriaki et al. 2025; Weber-Lewerenz and Traverso 2023). Other emerging technologies such as edge computing, blockchain, 5G communication, and autonomous systems are also contributing to the development of next-generation sustainable cities. Edge computing enables faster local data processing, while blockchain technologies improve data security and transparency in urban systems (Meng and Zhu 2024). Although these emerging technologies offer significant benefits, several challenges remain, including high computational costs, data privacy concerns, ethical issues, and the need for standardized urban data frameworks. Therefore, responsible and sustainable implementation of AI technologies is essential for achieving long-term urban sustainability goals.
4. AI for net-zero and climate-resilient urban systems
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a key technology for developing net-zero and climate-resilient urban systems. Rapid urbanization, increasing energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions, environmental degradation, and climate-related disasters have created serious challenges for cities worldwide. To address these challenges, governments and researchers are increasingly adopting AI-based technologies for improving energy efficiency, transportation systems, environmental monitoring, disaster management, and urban infrastructure planning. AI technologies can analyze large volumes of real-time urban data, identify patterns, make predictions, and support intelligent decision-making (Vishwakarma et al. 2025; Singh and Goyal 2023). These capabilities help cities reduce carbon emissions, optimize resource utilization, improve infrastructure performance, and strengthen climate resilience. The integration of AI with smart grids, renewable energy systems, digital twins, IoT sensors, and intelligent transportation systems is accelerating the transition toward sustainable and low-carbon cities (Bibri et al. 2024a; Jia et al. 2019). Figure 2 illustrates the conceptual AI framework for developing net-zero urban systems. Artificial intelligence acts as the central decision-making and intelligence layer that integrates six major technological components: data management, machine learning and analytics, predictive analytics, digital twins, optimization, and simulation. Data management provides reliable and integrated urban datasets for AI models. Machine learning and predictive analytics generate accurate forecasts and intelligent insights from large-scale urban data. Digital twins create virtual representations of physical urban systems to support real-time monitoring and scenario analysis, while optimization algorithms improve the efficiency of energy systems, transportation networks, and urban infrastructure. Simulation models evaluate different planning scenarios and policy interventions before implementation. Together, these interconnected technologies enable intelligent urban decision-making, improve resource efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, strengthen climate resilience, and accelerate the transition toward sustainable net-zero cities (Ishaq and Farooq 2023; Al-Raeei 2024).
Evidence of climate benefit requires outcome measures beyond AI prediction accuracy. For mitigation, relevant measures include absolute greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes of CO₂ equivalent and changes relative to a defined baseline or comparator. The reporting period, accounting boundary, emission factors, and treatment of electricity use and removals should be specified. Energy savings and improved forecasting accuracy are supporting indicators, but do not independently demonstrate emissions reductions or achievement of net zero. City-level inventories can follow the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (World Resources Institute 2021). For climate resilience, relevant outcome measures depend on the hazard and urban service being evaluated. Examples include the duration of service disruption, time needed to restore essential services, population exposed to hazardous heat or flooding, and hazard-related losses under comparable conditions. Warning lead time and detection accuracy indicate predictive capability, while evidence of reduced harm or improved service continuity is needed to demonstrate practical resilience benefits. This narrative review uses these distinctions to interpret the literature; it does not calculate a pooled effect or claim that all reviewed studies report comparable outcome measures.
4.1. AI in smart energy systems
Energy systems are one of the most important sectors in achieving net-zero cities. Traditional urban energy systems often face problems such as energy waste, inefficient distribution, high operational costs, and dependence on fossil fuels. AI technologies are increasingly being used to improve the efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of urban energy systems. AI-enabled smart grids can monitor electricity demand and supply in real time and optimize power distribution. Machine learning algorithms can forecast electricity consumption patterns and renewable energy production based on weather conditions, user behavior, and historical energy data. These predictive capabilities help reduce energy losses and improve grid stability (O’Dwyer et al. 2019). AI technologies are also supporting the integration of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power into urban energy networks. Since renewable energy generation depends on weather conditions, AI-based forecasting systems can predict fluctuations in energy production and balance supply and demand more effectively. This helps reduce dependence on fossil fuel-based backup systems and lowers greenhouse gas emissions (Mhlanga 2026; Bhatia et al. 2025; Neset et al. 2024).
In smart buildings, AI-based energy management systems optimize heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), lighting, and appliance usage. Sensors and IoT devices continuously collect data related to occupancy, temperature, humidity, and energy consumption. AI algorithms then analyze this data to automatically adjust building operations and reduce unnecessary energy usage (Nikpour et al. 2023). AI is also being used in predictive maintenance of energy infrastructure. Intelligent systems can detect equipment faults, monitor transformer health, and predict failures before they occur. This reduces operational downtime, maintenance costs, and energy losses. Recently, utility companies have started using AI-powered monitoring systems for wind turbines, power transmission networks, and energy storage systems to improve energy reliability and operational efficiency (Rajawat et al. 2022; Mensah 2025). Another emerging area is the use of explainable AI in smart energy governance. Explainable AI improves transparency and trust in AI-based decision-making systems by allowing users and operators to understand how AI models generate predictions and recommendations. This is important for energy policy implementation and public acceptance of AI-driven urban energy systems (Alsaigh et al. 2022).
The role of AI should also be considered alongside the physical technologies that determine energy-system performance. Reviews of building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems and high-temperature heat pumps examine design choices, operating conditions, and integration constraints relevant to energy efficiency and decarbonization (Abdelrazik et al. 2022; Elwardany et al. 2026). These studies provide engineering context rather than direct evidence of AI effectiveness. Any additional benefit attributed to AI-based forecasting or control should therefore be evaluated against an appropriate conventional-control baseline, rather than attributing the entire benefit of the underlying energy technology to AI.
4.2. AI for sustainable transportation
Transportation systems are major contributors to urban carbon emissions, air pollution, and traffic congestion. AI technologies are increasingly being applied to create sustainable and intelligent transportation systems that improve mobility while reducing environmental impacts. AI-based traffic management systems use real-time data from cameras, sensors, GPS devices, and connected vehicles to optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion. Machine learning algorithms can predict traffic patterns and dynamically control traffic signals to minimize waiting times and fuel consumption (Bharadiya 2023; Abduljabbar et al. 2019). These systems help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve urban air quality. AI also supports the development of smart public transportation systems. Predictive analytics can optimize bus routes, train schedules, and passenger flow management. Real-time transportation monitoring systems improve service efficiency and encourage the use of public transportation, which contributes to lower carbon emissions and reduced private vehicle dependence (Kashem et al. 2025; Alaba et al. 2024; Omefe et al. 2021).
Electric vehicles (EVs) are another important component of sustainable urban transportation. AI technologies help optimize EV charging infrastructure, battery management systems, and energy distribution networks. Smart charging systems can schedule charging activities during periods of low electricity demand or high renewable energy generation, reducing stress on urban power grids (Olawade et al. 2024). AI technologies are further being used for sustainable urban logistics and supply chain management. Intelligent routing systems can optimize delivery operations, reduce transportation distances, and lower fuel consumption in urban freight systems (Abduljabbar et al. 2019; Alaba et al. 2024; Bharadiya 2023).
Autonomous urban mobility should be evaluated in relation to its actual deployment conditions. Driverless passenger services are operating in selected cities and defined service areas, but these deployments should not be equated with unrestricted automated driving across all roads and conditions. For example, Waymo reported providing fully autonomous public trips in 14 cities in September 2026, with access being introduced progressively in its newest locations (Waymo 2026). Deployment has also encountered significant safety and regulatory setbacks. In October 2023, the California Department of Motor Vehicles suspended Cruise’s driverless testing and deployment permits, citing safety concerns and misrepresentation of safety-related information (California DMV 2023). This example demonstrates the importance of operational validation, transparent reporting, and regulatory oversight. For this review, autonomous operation alone is insufficient evidence of a sustainability benefit. Assessment should consider energy use and emissions per passenger-kilometre, occupancy, empty-vehicle travel, and changes in public-transport use and overall travel demand. Claims of lower congestion or emissions should therefore be supported by deployment-specific evidence rather than inferred from automation capability.
4.3. AI for climate resilience and environmental monitoring
Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of floods, heat waves, storms, droughts, and other environmental disasters in urban areas. AI technologies are playing an important role in helping cities improve climate resilience and environmental sustainability. AI-based environmental monitoring systems can continuously analyze data from satellites, drones, sensors, and weather stations to monitor air quality, water quality, urban heat islands, and greenhouse gas emissions (Neset et al. 2024; Srivastava and Maity 2023). These systems help governments and urban planners identify environmental risks and develop effective climate adaptation strategies. Flood prediction is one of the major applications of AI in climate resilience. Machine learning models can analyze rainfall patterns, river flow data, topography, and historical flood records to predict flood risks and issue early warning alerts (Mehryar et al. 2024; Chen and Dong 2025). AI-powered flood management systems help reduce disaster impacts and improve emergency response planning. AI is also increasingly used in urban heat management. Urban heat islands caused by dense infrastructure and limited green spaces can significantly affect public health and energy consumption. AI systems can monitor temperature patterns, identify heat-vulnerable regions, and support urban cooling strategies such as green infrastructure development and optimized building design (Chauhan et al. 2025; Rui et al. 2026).
Digital twins and AI-based simulation platforms are becoming important tools for climate-resilient urban planning. Digital twins create virtual models of urban systems using real-time data, allowing planners to simulate climate-related scenarios such as flooding, traffic congestion, and energy demand changes. Cities such as Singapore, Amsterdam, and Houston are already using digital twin technologies to improve climate adaptation and urban resilience planning (Ali et al. 2025; Sirmacek and Vinuesa 2022). AI technologies are also helping vulnerable and disaster-prone regions improve resilience through geospatial analysis and satellite image processing. AI-based systems can identify infrastructure vulnerabilities, assess structural damage risks, and support evidence-based urban planning for disaster preparedness (Tingzon et al. 2025; Najafi et al. 2026). Despite these benefits, challenges still exist in implementing AI for climate resilience. Reliable climate data, computational infrastructure, data sharing frameworks, and interdisciplinary collaboration are necessary for developing accurate and scalable AI systems. In addition, ethical concerns, algorithmic bias, cybersecurity risks, and energy consumption associated with large AI models must be addressed to ensure sustainable AI deployment in urban systems (Chauhan et al. 2025; Islam et al. 2024).
4.4. AI in smart infrastructure and resource management
Smart infrastructure management is another important application area of AI in sustainable cities. Urban infrastructure such as roads, bridges, buildings, pipelines, and water systems requires continuous monitoring and maintenance. AI technologies can improve infrastructure reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and enhance operational efficiency. AI-enabled predictive maintenance systems use sensors and machine learning algorithms to monitor infrastructure conditions and detect faults before failures occur. These systems reduce downtime, improve public safety, and extend infrastructure lifespan (Waqas Khan et al. 2024). In water management systems, AI technologies help detect leakages, optimize water distribution, and monitor water quality. Smart water networks can reduce water losses and improve resource efficiency in cities facing water scarcity challenges. AI is also supporting intelligent waste management systems. Smart waste collection systems use sensors and AI algorithms to optimize waste collection routes, monitor waste bin levels, and improve recycling operations. These technologies reduce fuel consumption, operational costs, and environmental pollution. Resource-efficient urban management is becoming increasingly important for achieving sustainable development goals (Almulhim 2025; Fortuna et al. 2023). AI-driven urban platforms can integrate data from multiple sectors such as transportation, energy, waste management, and environmental systems to support intelligent urban governance and sustainability planning (Varzeshi et al. 2026; Rad et al. 2025). Overall, AI technologies offer significant opportunities for developing net-zero and climate-resilient urban systems. However, responsible implementation, transparent governance, data security, and sustainable infrastructure investment are essential for ensuring that AI technologies contribute effectively to long-term urban sustainability (Mahor et al. 2022; Shulajkovska et al. 2024).
4.5. Qualitative evidence summary
Table 2 provides an illustrative summary of selected publications discussed in this narrative review. It is not an exhaustive inventory of the literature or the output of a documented systematic screening process. This distinction is necessary because a review of potential benefits does not itself demonstrate an improvement in urban performance.
Table 2. Selected publications discussed in the narrative review: scope, evidence type, reported contributions and limitations.
| Reference | Urban sector and technologies discussed | Evidence type and setting | Reported contribution | Interpretation and limits for the present review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibri et al. (2024a), eco-cities review | Environmental sustainability; AI and artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) | Systematic review and evidence synthesis across eco-city literature | Examines the foundations, enabling technologies, environmental applications and implementation challenges of smarter eco-cities. | Provides an organising perspective on AI-enabled environmental sustainability. Its synthesis should not be presented as a single measured city-wide improvement. |
| O’Dwyer et al. (2019) | Urban energy systems; forecasting, control and optimization | Review of smart energy techniques and implemented examples | Synthesises developments in smart energy systems, application areas, implementation challenges and future directions. | Supports discussion of energy-system approaches. Specific savings or forecasting improvements must be traced to the original studies reviewed. |
| Olawade et al. (2024) | Net-zero sustainability; AI applications across sectors | Review of AI opportunities, challenges and implementation considerations | Discusses AI applications for net-zero objectives alongside ethical issues, policy support, capacity building and scalability. | Provides broad context for net-zero applications. Urban outcomes need to be distinguished from findings concerning other sectors. |
| Mazzetto (2024) | Urban planning and management; urban digital twins | Literature review using bibliometric and thematic analysis | Examines urban digital twin integration, applications, challenges and future development. | Supports discussion of digital twin implementation. Digital twin functionality alone should not be treated as evidence of emissions reduction or improved resilience. |
| Ramu et al. (2022) | Smart city systems; federated learning and digital twins | Review and conceptual discussion across smart city applications | Discusses the integration of federated learning with digital twins, including developments, benefits, limitations and research directions. | Provides a basis for discussing distributed learning. Privacy protection and operational benefits require evaluation of specific implementations. |
| Alnaser et al. (2024) | Buildings, facilities and urban systems; AI, IoT and digital twins | Systematic literature review with scientometric analysis | Maps research on digital twins in construction and facility management, AI–IoT integration for energy optimization, and sustainable built environments. | Identifies application areas and research directions. It should not be described as an original experiment demonstrating improved building energy performance. |
| Sacoto-Cabrera et al. (2025) | Smart city development; IoT, AI and urban digital twins | Systematic review with bibliometric and thematic analysis | Maps technological and methodological themes in the integration of IoT, AI and digital twins and proposes a research agenda. | Supports comparison of research themes. Bibliometric patterns do not establish the magnitude of environmental or social benefits. |
| Xu et al. (2024) | Urban data, design and modeling; generative AI and digital twins | Scoping review; cited version is an arXiv preprint | Reviews data augmentation, synthetic data and scenario generation, automated 3D city modeling, and generative urban design. | Provides an overview of emerging approaches. The cited preprint should be identified clearly and should not be presented as a validated city-wide deployment. |
| Rui et al. (2026) | Urban extreme heat management; AI-based forecasting, monitoring, mitigation and decision support | Systematic review of urban heat research | Synthesises AI applications across the main stages of urban extreme heat management. | Supports the climate-adaptation discussion. Forecasting or monitoring performance must be distinguished from demonstrated reductions in heat exposure or harm. |
| Temple et al. (2024) | Urban governance; digital twin-based decision and policy support | Systematic literature review published as a conference paper | Establishes a literature-based foundation for developing digital twin decision-support frameworks in the public sector. | Provides conceptual support for governance applications. The paper describes further framework development as future work, rather than a completed deployment evaluation. |
| Yigitcanlar et al. (2019) | Smart city development and urban sustainability; broader digital urbanism | Systematic review of smart and sustainable city literature | Examines the relationship between smart city initiatives and sustainability, questioning whether technological advancement ensures sustainable outcomes. | Provides a conceptual basis for evaluating sustainability claims. It is not a direct performance evaluation of a particular AI intervention. |
| Rad et al. (2025) | Urban planning, procurement and supply chains; AI-supported decision-making | Scoping literature review published as a conference chapter | Synthesises AI applications in urban design and the evaluation and selection of contractors and suppliers. | Relevant to planning and procurement. It should not be classified as a study measuring the environmental footprint of AI computing. |
The table identifies each publication’s scope, evidence type, reported contribution and limitations. The final column presents the present authors’ interpretation of the relevance and evidential limitations of each publication. The table is intended to support qualitative comparison; it does not establish the distribution of research across countries, technologies or implementation levels.
The evidence summarized in Table 2 should be interpreted according to its type and evaluation setting. Review articles identify applications and research directions, but do not themselves establish the effectiveness of a particular intervention. Similarly, improvements in prediction accuracy do not necessarily produce lower emissions or greater resilience. Such claims require evidence connecting model outputs to operational decisions and measurable outcomes against a suitable comparator. For the present review, important assessment questions are whether an application was evaluated in simulation or actual operation, whether its benefits persisted over time, and whether the evaluation included implementation costs, computational demands, and local infrastructure constraints. Where these details are unavailable, conclusions about effectiveness and transferability remain limited.
5. Smart governance and digital twins
Rapid urbanization, climate change, increasing energy demand, and infrastructure complexity have created major challenges for city management and governance. Traditional urban management approaches are often unable to efficiently handle large-scale urban data, real-time decision-making, and sustainability planning. As a result, smart governance and digital twin technologies are becoming important tools for developing sustainable, resilient, and intelligent cities. Smart governance refers to the use of digital technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), big data, Internet of Things (IoT), and communication systems to improve urban management, public services, citizen participation, and policy decision-making. Smart governance aims to make cities more efficient, transparent, sustainable, and citizen-centered through data-driven urban management systems (Mazzetto 2024; Shulajkovska et al. 2024). Digital twins are virtual replicas of physical systems, infrastructure, or entire cities that continuously receive real-time data from sensors, satellites, IoT devices, and communication networks. When integrated with AI technologies, digital twins can simulate urban operations, predict future scenarios, optimize infrastructure management, and support evidence-based urban planning. These technologies are increasingly being adopted in sustainable city development and climate-resilient urban governance (Yessef et al. 2025).
5.1. Urban digital twins
Urban digital twins are among the most important emerging technologies in smart city development. An urban digital twin is a real-time digital representation of urban systems such as transportation networks, buildings, energy systems, water infrastructure, environmental conditions, and public services. These digital platforms combine data from sensors, IoT devices, satellite imagery, drones, and geographic information systems to create dynamic urban simulation models. Digital twins help city authorities monitor urban infrastructure performance, identify risks, predict system failures, and optimize resource management. Unlike conventional urban planning tools, digital twins provide real-time monitoring and predictive capabilities, enabling more efficient urban governance and sustainability management (Deren et al. 2021; Thuraka 2021; Dembski et al. 2020). AI technologies significantly improve the functionality of digital twins by enabling intelligent data analysis, prediction, automation, and decision support. Machine learning algorithms can analyze large volumes of urban data to identify patterns related to traffic congestion, energy demand, environmental pollution, flood risks, and infrastructure degradation. These predictive capabilities help governments make faster and more accurate decisions (Tandon and Shaheen 2024; Vergara-Perucich 2025).
Urban digital twins are widely applied in:
- transportation planning,
- energy optimization,
- environmental monitoring,
- disaster management,
- infrastructure maintenance,
- and climate resilience planning.
For example, digital twins can simulate flooding conditions in vulnerable urban regions and help authorities design emergency response strategies. They can also support traffic management by predicting congestion and optimizing transportation routes in real time (Mazzetto 2024). Several cities around the world have already started implementing digital twin technologies. Singapore uses its “Virtual Singapore” platform for urban planning and environmental management, while Amsterdam and Houston use digital twins for climate resilience, water management, and infrastructure monitoring (Ali et al. 2025). The integration of AI, IoT, and digital twins is also supporting the development of smart and sustainable building environments. AI-driven digital twins can continuously monitor building energy performance, occupancy patterns, and environmental conditions to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions (Alnaser et al. 2024).
5.2. AI-based decision support systems
AI-based decision support systems are becoming increasingly important in smart governance and urban planning. These systems analyze large and complex urban datasets to support policymakers, city administrators, and infrastructure managers in making informed decisions. Traditional urban governance often depends on static data and delayed reporting systems, which limit the ability of authorities to respond quickly to urban challenges. In contrast, AI-based systems provide real-time analysis and predictive insights that improve operational efficiency and urban resilience (Yigitcanlar et al. 2025).
Machine learning and deep learning models can analyze data related to:
- transportation,
- energy consumption,
- public health,
- environmental quality,
- crime patterns,
- infrastructure conditions.
These systems help authorities identify emerging urban risks and optimize resource allocation. AI-based decision systems are especially useful in climate adaptation and disaster management. For example, AI models can predict flood risks, heat waves, air pollution levels, and energy demand fluctuations based on historical and real-time environmental data. This enables urban planners to implement preventive measures and improve emergency preparedness (Temple et al. 2024; Mahor et al. 2022). Digital twins further strengthen urban decision-making by allowing policymakers to simulate multiple urban scenarios before implementing policies or infrastructure projects. Urban authorities can evaluate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of proposed urban developments using simulation-based planning systems.
Generative AI technologies are also emerging as powerful tools in urban governance. Large language models and generative AI systems can support urban planning, citizen communication, automated reporting, and policy analysis. Generative AI can create predictive urban scenarios, infrastructure layouts, and sustainability strategies that assist decision-makers in complex planning processes (Xu et al. 2024; Mkhitaryan et al. 2026). In addition, AI-based governance systems improve transparency and efficiency in public administration. Smart governance platforms can automate routine administrative processes, monitor public service performance, and improve communication between governments and citizens.
5.3. Citizen-centric smart governance
Citizen participation is an important component of sustainable and inclusive urban governance. Smart governance systems aim not only to improve urban efficiency but also to strengthen citizen engagement, transparency, and public trust. AI-powered digital platforms enable governments to collect citizen feedback, monitor public concerns, and improve service delivery. Smart city applications allow residents to report infrastructure problems, monitor environmental conditions, access public transportation information, and participate in urban planning processes. Citizen-centric digital twin systems are also being developed to support participatory governance (Aboh and Chuka 2025; Bhatia et al. 2025). These platforms allow citizens to visualize proposed urban projects, understand infrastructure impacts, and contribute to policy discussions. Public participation helps ensure that smart city initiatives address local community needs and social sustainability goals (Mensah 2025; Mhlanga 2026).
Smart governance systems can also improve accessibility and inclusiveness in urban services. AI-based technologies support intelligent healthcare systems, smart mobility services, emergency response systems, and personalized public services for vulnerable populations. However, the implementation of citizen-centered smart governance also raises important ethical and social concerns. Large-scale urban data collection may create privacy and surveillance risks if not managed responsibly. Issues related to cybersecurity, algorithmic bias, data ownership, and digital inequality remain major challenges in AI-driven urban governance systems (Bibri et al. 2024b). The digital divide is another critical issue, especially in developing countries where access to digital infrastructure and technical skills may be limited. Therefore, inclusive policies and responsible governance frameworks are necessary to ensure that AI technologies benefit all citizens equally.
6. Challenges and limitations
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant opportunities for developing sustainable, net-zero, and climate-resilient cities. AI technologies can improve energy efficiency, transportation systems, infrastructure management, environmental monitoring, and urban governance. However, despite these advantages, several technical, environmental, economic, ethical, and social challenges still limit the large-scale implementation of AI in sustainable urban systems (Vergara-Perucich 2025). The successful development of AI-enabled sustainable cities requires not only advanced technologies but also reliable infrastructure, responsible governance, public trust, and long-term policy support. Many cities, especially in developing countries, still face difficulties in integrating AI systems into existing urban infrastructure due to limited resources, insufficient technical expertise, and fragmented governance systems (Bibri et al. 2024a).
6.1. Data privacy, cybersecurity, and operational resilience
Cybersecurity risks in connected urban infrastructure extend beyond unauthorized disclosure of personal data. Compromised credentials, exposed controllers, malicious software, or manipulated sensor inputs can undermine operational decisions and interrupt essential services. AI adds further attack surfaces, including poisoning of training data and inputs designed to evade or mislead a model (NIST 2025). These risks should be evaluated across the sensing, communication, model, and control layers. A documented example is the exploitation of Unitronics programmable logic controllers at a United States water facility in 2023. CISA reported that the affected authority took the system offline and switched to manual operation, with no known risk to drinking water or water supply (CISA 2023). This was an operational-technology incident, not evidence of an attack on an AI model, but it demonstrates the infrastructure dependencies that AI-enabled urban services can inherit. A layered protection strategy should include restricted remote access, strong authentication, separation of operational networks, removal of unnecessary internet exposure, tested software updates, and recoverable controller configurations. AI-specific evaluation should additionally examine data integrity and robustness to manipulated inputs. Manual fallback procedures and recovery exercises remain necessary because automated detection cannot guarantee prevention. Security evaluation should therefore consider service continuity and recovery time, as well as attack-detection performance.
AI systems in smart cities depend heavily on large volumes of real-time data collected from sensors, surveillance cameras, smartphones, connected vehicles, smart meters, social media, and IoT devices. These datasets often include sensitive personal information related to citizen activities, transportation patterns, healthcare, energy consumption, and communication systems. The large-scale collection and storage of urban data create serious concerns regarding privacy and cybersecurity. Unauthorized access, cyberattacks, data breaches, and misuse of personal information can threaten both public safety and citizen trust. AI-driven smart city platforms may also increase surveillance activities if appropriate data governance policies are not implemented (Kitchin 2016). Another challenge is data ownership and transparency. In many smart city systems, citizens may not clearly understand how their personal data are collected, analyzed, shared, or stored. Lack of transparency in AI algorithms may further reduce public trust in smart governance systems. To address these challenges, strong cybersecurity frameworks, data protection regulations, encryption technologies, and transparent data governance policies are necessary. Privacy-preserving AI approaches such as federated learning and secure multi-party computation are also gaining attention because they allow AI systems to analyze data without directly sharing sensitive information (Ramu et al. 2022).
6.2. Ethical and responsible AI
Ethical concerns are among the most important challenges in AI-enabled urban systems. AI algorithms can unintentionally produce biased or unfair outcomes if they are trained using incomplete, inaccurate, or unbalanced datasets. Bias in AI systems may affect urban governance, public services, law enforcement, healthcare, transportation, and infrastructure planning. For example, AI-based surveillance or predictive policing systems may disproportionately affect certain communities due to biased training data. Similarly, AI systems used for public service allocation may unintentionally create inequality in access to urban resources and opportunities. The “black-box” nature of many AI models is another major concern. In some advanced deep learning systems, it is difficult to understand how the AI model generates predictions or decisions. Lack of explainability reduces transparency and accountability in public decision-making systems (Alsaigh et al. 2022).
Responsible AI governance requires:
- transparency,
- fairness,
- accountability,
- explainability,
- and human oversight.
Governments and urban authorities must establish ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks to ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and inclusively in sustainable cities.
6.3. Environmental footprint of AI and assessment of net climate benefits
AI introduces environmental costs that must be considered alongside its potential contribution to urban decarbonization. These costs arise from model development, training, repeated inference, data storage, and supporting computing infrastructure. Strubell et al. (2019) demonstrated the importance of accounting for the computational costs of developing deep-learning systems. Such estimates are specific to the workloads and assumptions examined and should not be treated as a universal footprint for every AI model. The International Energy Agency estimated that data centres consumed approximately 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, equivalent to about 1.5% of global electricity consumption (IEA 2025). This estimate covers data centres generally and must not be attributed entirely to AI. It nevertheless illustrates why growing computational demand matters when assessing digitally enabled climate strategies. For urban applications, the relevant question is whether the intervention produces a net environmental improvement compared with an appropriate alternative. Assessment should include the additional electricity required for training and operation, associated emissions, hardware production where relevant, and cooling-related resource use. Potential rebound effects should also be considered: lower operating costs or improved service availability may increase total demand and partly offset efficiency gains. We recommend that evaluations report computational energy use alongside service performance and estimated avoided emissions, using a consistent boundary and assessment period. Smaller task-specific models, less frequent retraining where performance permits, efficient hardware, and appropriate workload scheduling should be evaluated as possible mitigation options. Neither edge processing nor cloud deployment should automatically be assumed to have the lower footprint; the comparison depends on utilization, communication requirements, equipment, and electricity supply.
6.4. Lack of standardization and interoperability
Smart city systems often involve multiple technologies, platforms, communication protocols, and infrastructure networks developed by different organizations and vendors. Lack of standardization creates interoperability problems between urban systems such as transportation, energy, healthcare, environmental monitoring, and governance platforms. Many cities still operate fragmented digital infrastructures where data exchange between different departments and systems is limited. This reduces the efficiency of AI-based decision-making and prevents the development of integrated urban management platforms (Mazzetto 2024). Digital twin systems also require standardized data models and communication frameworks to integrate data from multiple urban sectors. Without interoperability standards, cities may face difficulties in scaling AI solutions across large urban regions. International collaboration and common technological standards are therefore important for enabling efficient smart city development and data sharing.
6.5. Economic and infrastructure constraints
The implementation of AI technologies in sustainable cities often requires significant financial investment, advanced infrastructure, high-speed communication networks, cloud computing systems, and skilled technical professionals. Many developing countries and smaller cities face economic limitations that restrict the adoption of advanced AI systems. Limited access to digital infrastructure, insufficient funding, lack of technical expertise, and weak policy support can delay smart city development (Olawade et al. 2024). In addition, maintaining AI systems and updating digital infrastructure require long-term operational costs and continuous technological upgrades. Urban authorities must therefore carefully evaluate economic feasibility and sustainability before implementing large-scale AI projects. Public-private partnerships, government funding programs, and international collaboration may help support AI adoption in resource-limited urban regions.
6.6. Social inclusion and digital divide
The digital divide is another major challenge in AI-enabled smart city development. Unequal access to digital technologies, internet connectivity, education, and technical skills can create social inequality and limit citizen participation in smart governance systems. Vulnerable populations, low-income communities, elderly citizens, and rural migrants may face difficulties accessing digital public services or participating in AI-driven urban systems. If smart city technologies are not designed inclusively, they may increase social and economic inequality rather than reduce it (van Deursen and van Dijk 2018). AI-based urban services should therefore prioritize accessibility, affordability, and inclusiveness. Governments must also invest in digital literacy programs, public awareness campaigns, and equitable digital infrastructure development to ensure that all citizens benefit from AI technologies. Citizen participation and community engagement are essential for developing socially sustainable smart cities.
6.7. Governance and regulatory challenges
AI technologies are evolving much faster than existing legal and policy frameworks. Many countries still lack comprehensive regulations related to AI ethics, urban data governance, cybersecurity, liability, and automated decision-making systems. Unclear regulatory frameworks may create uncertainty regarding accountability, transparency, and legal responsibility in AI-driven urban systems. For example, questions remain regarding who is responsible if AI systems fail or produce harmful outcomes in transportation, healthcare, or infrastructure management. Smart governance systems also require coordination between multiple stakeholders including governments, private companies, researchers, infrastructure providers, and citizens. Weak institutional coordination may slow down smart city implementation and policy integration (Yigitcanlar et al. 2019). Future urban governance frameworks must therefore combine technological innovation with ethical regulations, sustainability policies, and human-centered planning approaches.
Urban AI deployment is also shaped by specific regulatory and governance instruments. The European Union’s AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, establishes a risk-based framework. Certain uses involving safety components in critical infrastructure can fall within its high-risk provisions. Relevant requirements address risk management, data governance, documentation, logging, human oversight, accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity. Classification depends on the intended use and applicable legal provisions; not every urban AI application is automatically high-risk (European Parliament and Council 2024). The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology’s AI Risk Management Framework provides voluntary guidance for managing AI risks through governance, contextual assessment, measurement, and risk management (Tabassi 2023). It should be distinguished from binding legislation. For urban authorities, these instruments highlight the need to establish responsibilities between suppliers and public agencies, document system limitations, provide appropriate human oversight, and plan monitoring and incident response. Procurement decisions should therefore assess accountability and operational safeguards alongside predictive performance.
Table 3. Challenges, impacts, and mitigation strategies for AI-enabled sustainable cities.
| Challenge | Potential Impact on Sustainable Cities | Possible Mitigation Strategies | Future Research Needs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data privacy and security | Risk of unauthorized access, cyberattacks, loss of public trust, and misuse of sensitive urban data | Strong cybersecurity frameworks, data encryption, privacy-preserving AI, federated learning, secure data governance | Privacy-aware AI models, secure data-sharing protocols, trustworthy AI frameworks |
| Algorithmic bias and fairness | Unfair decision-making, social inequality, discrimination in public services and urban planning | Diverse and representative datasets, bias detection algorithms, fairness-aware AI, regular model auditing | Explainable and unbiased AI models for public decision-making |
| Lack of explainability | Reduced transparency and limited public acceptance of AI-based decisions | Explainable AI (XAI), interpretable machine learning models, human oversight | Transparent AI models for critical urban applications |
| High energy consumption of AI systems | Increased electricity demand, higher operational costs, additional carbon emissions | Green AI, energy-efficient algorithms, renewable energy-powered data centres, edge computing | Low-carbon AI computing, energy-aware model optimization |
| Poor data quality and availability | Inaccurate predictions, unreliable urban planning, poor system performance | Standardized data collection, real-time sensor calibration, data validation techniques | Urban benchmark datasets and data quality assessment frameworks |
| Lack of interoperability | Difficulty integrating different smart city platforms and infrastructure systems | Open standards, interoperable communication protocols, common data models | Unified architectures for AI-enabled smart city platforms |
| High implementation cost | Limited AI adoption, especially in developing cities and small municipalities | Public-private partnerships, phased implementation, cloud-based AI services, government funding | Cost-effective AI deployment models and scalable infrastructure |
| Limited digital infrastructure | Poor connectivity, reduced system reliability, restricted real-time monitoring | Expansion of broadband, 5G networks, cloud and edge computing infrastructure | AI solutions for low-resource and developing urban environments |
| Digital divide and social exclusion | Unequal access to digital services, reduced citizen participation, social inequality | Digital literacy programmes, inclusive policies, affordable digital technologies | Human-centred and inclusive AI systems for sustainable cities |
| Regulatory and governance gaps | Unclear legal responsibilities, inconsistent AI implementation, weak policy coordination | AI governance frameworks, ethical guidelines, national and international standards | Adaptive regulatory frameworks for AI-enabled urban governance |
| Climate uncertainty and dynamic urban environments | Reduced prediction accuracy and planning reliability under changing climate conditions | Continuous model updating, real-time monitoring, adaptive AI systems | AI models capable of handling uncertain and dynamic urban scenarios |
| Public trust and acceptance | Resistance to AI adoption and reduced participation in smart city initiatives | Transparent governance, citizen engagement, explainable AI, public awareness campaigns | Citizen-centred governance models and trust evaluation frameworks |
Table 3 summarizes the major technical, environmental, economic, governance, and social challenges associated with the implementation of artificial intelligence in sustainable cities. For each challenge, the corresponding impacts on urban sustainability, practical mitigation strategies, and future research needs are presented. The table highlights that achieving net-zero and climate-resilient cities requires not only technological innovation but also responsible governance, secure digital infrastructure, ethical AI practices, inclusive policies, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Addressing these challenges will improve the reliability, transparency, scalability, and long-term sustainability of AI-enabled urban systems.
7. Future perspectives and research directions
The following research directions represent the authors’ interpretation of the issues discussed in this narrative review. They are proposed priorities for future investigation, rather than established findings or predictions of inevitable technological progress. The emphasis is on evaluating AI applications under practical urban conditions, assessing their environmental costs and benefits, and establishing accountable and inclusive implementation practices.
7.1. Explainable and responsible AI
One of the major future research directions in smart city development is explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Many current AI systems operate as “black-box” models where decision-making processes are difficult to understand. In urban governance and critical infrastructure systems, lack of transparency may reduce public trust and create ethical concerns. Explainable AI aims to improve the transparency, interpretability, and accountability of AI systems. XAI models can help urban authorities, policymakers, and citizens understand how AI systems generate predictions, recommendations, and decisions. This is especially important in sectors such as transportation, healthcare, public safety, energy management, and disaster response where AI-driven decisions may directly affect human lives (Alsaigh et al. 2022; Thuraka 2021).
Future research should focus on:
- transparent AI models,
- ethical AI governance,
- fairness and bias reduction,
- human-centered AI systems,
- regulatory frameworks for responsible AI deployment.
Responsible AI development will be essential for ensuring that smart city technologies remain socially inclusive, secure, and sustainable.
7.2. Integration of AI and digital twins
The integration of AI with digital twin technology is expected to become one of the most transformative developments in future sustainable cities. Digital twins provide virtual replicas of urban systems, while AI enables intelligent data analysis, prediction, optimization, and automation.
Future AI-powered digital twins may support:
- real-time urban monitoring,
- climate adaptation planning,
- infrastructure optimization,
- disaster prediction,
- traffic management,
- energy system control.
These systems can continuously simulate urban scenarios and help authorities evaluate policy decisions before real-world implementation. For example, digital twins may predict flooding impacts, optimize renewable energy integration, or simulate transportation changes to reduce congestion and carbon emissions (Mazzetto 2024).
Future research should focus on improving:
- scalability of urban digital twins,
- interoperability between systems,
- real-time data integration,
- cybersecurity,
- energy-efficient simulation models.
The integration of digital twins with geospatial technologies, satellite data, drones, and AI analytics will further improve urban resilience and sustainability planning.
7.3. AI for circular economy and resource efficiency
Future sustainable cities will increasingly adopt circular economy principles to reduce waste generation, improve recycling, and optimize resource utilization. AI technologies can significantly support circular economy systems through intelligent waste management, material tracking, predictive maintenance, and resource optimization. AI-based systems can monitor resource consumption patterns and improve recycling operations using automated waste sorting and predictive collection systems. Machine learning models may also optimize industrial processes to minimize energy use and material waste.
Future research is expected to explore AI applications in:
- smart recycling systems,
- sustainable manufacturing,
- circular supply chains,
- water reuse systems,
- low-carbon construction materials.
The combination of AI, IoT, and blockchain technologies may also improve transparency and traceability in urban resource management systems (Bibri et al. 2024a; Subramanian et al. 2023).
7.4. Autonomous and intelligent urban infrastructure
Autonomous infrastructure systems are likely to become an important component of future studies. AI-enabled autonomous systems can continuously monitor infrastructure performance, detect faults, optimize operations, and perform predictive maintenance with minimal human intervention (Mehan 2026).
Future urban infrastructure may include:
- self-optimizing smart grids,
- autonomous transportation systems,
- AI-managed water distribution networks,
- intelligent waste management systems,
- automated environmental monitoring platforms.
AI combined with robotics and autonomous systems may also improve disaster response and emergency management in climate-vulnerable urban regions.
Research in this area should focus on:
- infrastructure reliability,
- human-AI collaboration,
- resilient communication systems,
- autonomous urban operations,
- energy-efficient AI hardware.
Future research should compare edge and cloud deployment under equivalent workloads, considering response time, communication requirements, energy use, and emissions (Xu et al. 2024).
7.5. Human-centered and inclusive smart cities
Future studies should prioritize human well-being, social inclusion, and citizen participation rather than focusing only on technological advancement. Human-centered AI systems aim to improve quality of life, accessibility, healthcare, safety, and public engagement. AI technologies can support personalized public services, intelligent healthcare systems, accessible transportation, and inclusive governance platforms. Citizen-centric urban planning approaches will become increasingly important for ensuring that smart city initiatives address local community needs and social sustainability goals (Mahor et al. 2022; Mensah 2025).
Future research should focus on:
- reducing the digital divide,
- improving digital literacy,
- increasing accessibility of urban services,
- strengthening citizen participation,
- ensuring equitable access to AI technologies.
Inclusive governance frameworks are necessary to prevent social inequality and ensure that the benefits of AI technologies are shared across all sections of society (Yigitcanlar et al. 2019).
7.6. Green AI and sustainable computing
As AI systems become more complex and computationally intensive, future research must also focus on reducing the environmental impacts of AI technologies themselves. Large-scale AI models and cloud computing systems consume substantial amounts of energy and may contribute to carbon emissions (Vergara-Perucich 2025). Green AI aims to develop energy-efficient AI algorithms, low-power hardware systems, and sustainable data center operations. Future research may include:
- renewable energy-powered data centers,
- energy-efficient machine learning algorithms,
- lightweight AI models,
- carbon-aware computing systems.
The development of sustainable AI infrastructure will be critical for ensuring that AI contributes positively to climate goals and net-zero urban development.
8. Cross-sector interpretation
The authors interpret the applications discussed in this review through three questions: what task the AI system performs, what urban outcome is evaluated, and under what conditions the reported result is obtained. This distinction is important because prediction accuracy, operational efficiency and climate-related outcomes represent different levels of evidence. An improvement in forecasting, for example, does not by itself establish a reduction in emissions or an improvement in disaster preparedness. A second consideration is the suitability of an approach for a particular urban setting. Results should be interpreted alongside the study’s data, comparison method, evaluation period and implementation conditions. A result obtained in a simulation or an individual facility should not be assumed to apply across an entire city. Similarly, the availability of a digital platform does not establish that institutions have the resources or authority needed to act on its outputs. The central interpretation of this review is therefore that AI should be assessed as part of an urban decision-making process. Its value depends on whether its outputs inform effective actions and whether the resulting benefits justify the resources and risks involved. This interpretation provides a basis for the research priorities proposed in Section 7. It is not a quantitative finding about the prevalence or effectiveness of AI across the wider literature.
9. Conclusion
This narrative review examines AI applications relevant to urban climate mitigation and adaptation across energy, transportation, environmental monitoring, infrastructure and governance. It brings together discussions of their intended benefits and the technical, environmental and institutional conditions affecting implementation. The central conclusion is that technical performance should be distinguished from demonstrated sustainability outcomes. Claims about emissions reduction or climate resilience require evidence connecting model outputs to practical actions and measured consequences. Data quality, cybersecurity, accountability, accessibility and the environmental costs of computing also need to be considered when interpreting the value of an application. Because the review does not use a reproducible systematic selection process, its conclusions are limited to a qualitative interpretation of the cited literature. The proposed research priorities emphasise transparent evaluation, testing under practical urban conditions and explicit measurement of environmental and social outcomes.
Declarations
Author contributions. Rakesh A. Afre: Conceptualisation: Developed the overarching themes and objectives of the review. Methodology: Designed the review framework and criteria for literature selection. Writing – Original Draft: Wrote the initial manuscript draft, including key sections. Supervision: Supervised the study. Bhavana B. Thakre: Literature Review: Conducted a comprehensive search and analysis of relevant literature. Writing – Review & Editing: Contributed to the revision of the manuscript, focusing on clarity and coherence. Radha Panchal and Sandhyatai Kadam: Literature Review: Conducted a comprehensive search and analysis of relevant literature. Writing – Review & Editing: Assisted in editing and refining the final manuscript, ensuring accuracy and completeness. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of interest. The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Data availability. This narrative review draws on published sources cited in the reference list. No original experimental or simulation datasets were generated. The qualitative summaries of selected publications are presented in the manuscript and Table 2. Complete original search histories, screening decisions, and exclusion records are unavailable; therefore, a reproducible search and screening dataset cannot be provided. This limitation is acknowledged in Section 2.
Ethics. This article is a literature review based on published sources. It does not involve human participants, animal experiments, or the collection or analysis of individual-level personal data. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
Generative AI. The authors used OpenAI's ChatGPT to assist with language improvement, manuscript organization, and figure conceptualization. All AI-assisted content was carefully reviewed, verified, and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank the management of DPGU and the Director, STR, DPGU, for constant support and encouragement to do this work and implement it in the curriculum.
References
- Abdelrazik, A.S.; Shboul, Bashar; Elwardany, Mohamed; Zohny, R.N.; Osama, Ahmed (2022) 'The recent advancements in the building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) systems: An updated review', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 170, pp. 112988. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112988
- Abduljabbar, Rusul; Dia, Hussein; Liyanage, Sohani; Bagloee, Saeed Asadi (2019) 'Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Transport: An Overview', Sustainability, 11(1), pp. 189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010189
- Aboh, Blaise; Chuka, Justin (2025) 'Agentic AI and the Future of Urban Regeneration: Governance, Ethics, and Global Applications'. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5854322
- Al-Raeei, Marwan (2024) 'Artificial intelligence for climate resilience: advancing sustainable goals in SDGs 11 and 13 and its relationship to pandemics', Discover Sustainability, 5(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00775-5
- Alaba, Fadele Ayotunde; Oluwadare, Adegbemile; Sani, Usman; Oriyomi, Abudu Abimbola; Lucy, Adejo Omoka; Najeem, Owamoyo (2024) 'Enabling Sustainable Transportation Through IoT and AIoT Innovations', Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 273-291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53433-1_14
- Ali, Eslam; Mansour, Ahmed; Mohammed Abdelkader, Eslam; Elshaboury, Nehal; Zayed, Tarek (2025) 'Digital Twin for Climate Resilience: Transforming Smart Cities for a Sustainable Future', The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-G-2025, pp. 139-145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-g-2025-139-2025
- Almulhim, Abdulaziz I. (2025) 'Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Smart Infrastructure Management for Sustainable Urban Planning', Technologies, 13(11), pp. 481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13110481
- Alnaser, Aljawharah A.; Maxi, Mina; Elmousalami, Haytham (2024) 'AI-Powered Digital Twins and Internet of Things for Smart Cities and Sustainable Building Environment', Applied Sciences, 14(24), pp. 12056. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/app142412056
- Alsaigh, R., Mehmood, R., and Katib, I. (2022) 'AI Explainability and Governance in Smart Energy Systems: A Review', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00069
- Bharadiya, Jasmin (2023) 'Artificial Intelligence in Transportation Systems A Critical Review', American Journal of Computing and Engineering, 6(1), pp. 34-45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.1487
- Bhatia, Bhavi; Sharma, Geetika; Bansal, Jaya; Abbass, Mahapara; Akhai, Shalom; Kaur, Preetinder (2025) 'AI for urban planning and management', AIP Conference Proceedings, 3343, pp. 040022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292571
- Bibri, Simon Elias; Krogstie, John; Kaboli, Amin; Alahi, Alexandre (2024a) 'Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review', Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 19, pp. 100330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330
- Bibri, Simon Elias; Huang, Jeffrey; Jagatheesaperumal, Senthil Kumar; Krogstie, John (2024b) 'The synergistic interplay of artificial intelligence and digital twin in environmentally planning sustainable smart cities: A comprehensive systematic review', Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 20, pp. 100433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100433
- California DMV (2023) DMV Statement on Cruise LLC Suspension. Available at: https://qr.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-statement-on-cruise-llc-suspension/?
- Chauhan, Avnish; Kumari, Meena; Sethi, Muneesh; Pandey, Gaurav; Devi, Sushila; Rocha, Layza Sá; Singh, Man Vir (2025) 'Role of Advanced Techniques to Adapt Climate Resilience', Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 209-229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06791-3_11
- Chen, Cai; Dong, Jin (2025) 'Deep learning approaches for time series prediction in climate resilience applications', Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1574981
- CISA (2023) Exploitation of Unitronics PLCs used in Water and Wastewater Systems. Available at: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCISA/bulletins/37d467f
- de la Torre, Rocio; Corlu, Canan G.; Faulin, Javier; Onggo, Bhakti S.; Juan, Angel A. (2021) 'Simulation, Optimization, and Machine Learning in Sustainable Transportation Systems: Models and Applications', Sustainability, 13(3), pp. 1551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031551
- Dembski, Fabian; Wössner, Uwe; Letzgus, Mike; Ruddat, Michael; Yamu, Claudia (2020) 'Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany', Sustainability, 12(6), pp. 2307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307
- Deren, Li; Wenbo, Yu; Zhenfeng, Shao (2021) 'Smart city based on digital twins', Computational Urban Science, 1(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-021-00005-y
- El-Agamy, Rasha F.; Sayed, Hanaa A.; AL Akhatatneh, Arwa M.; Aljohani, Mansourah; Elhosseini, Mostafa (2024) 'Comprehensive analysis of digital twins in smart cities: a 4200-paper bibliometric study', Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10781-8
- Elghaish, Faris; Matarneh, Sandra; Hosseini, M. Reza; Tezel, Algan; Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed; Taghikhah, Firouzeh (2024) 'Predictive digital twin technologies for achieving net zero carbon emissions: a critical review and future research agenda', Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(2), pp. 680-709. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-03-2024-0096
- Elwardany, Mohamed; Turja, Asif Iqbal; Hasan, Md Mahmudul; Nassif, Nabil (2026) 'High-temperature heat pumps for industrial decarbonization: Technologies, integration strategies, and future perspectives', Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 225, pp. 110806. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2026.110806
- European Parliament and Council (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
- Fortuna, Carolina; Yetgin, Halil; Mohorčič, Mihael (2023) 'Smart Infrastructures: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Lifecycle Automation', IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 17(2), pp. 37-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/mie.2022.3165673
- Gupta, S., and Degbelo, A. (2022) 'An Empirical Analysis of AI Contributions to Sustainable Cities (SDG11)', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02879
- He, Bao-Jie; Prasad, Deo (2024) 'Delivering Sustainable, Resilient, and Low-Carbon-Built Environments', Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 93-115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7671-9_5
- Huzzat, Annysha; Anpalagan, Alagan; Khwaja, Ahmed S.; Woungang, Isaac; Alnoman, Ali A.; Pillai, Anju S. (2025) 'A comprehensive review of Digital Twin technologies in smart cities', Digital Engineering, 4, pp. 100040. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dte.2025.100040
- IEA (2025) Energy and AI. IEA, Paris. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai
- IPCC (2022) 'Annex II: Glossary', Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
- IPCC (2023) 'Annex I: Glossary', Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report.
- Ishaq, K., and Farooq, S. S. (2023) 'Exploring IoT in smart cities: Practices, challenges and way forward', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.12344
- Islam, S. N., Biswas, A., Chowdhury, A. K. (2023) 'AI-Enabled Cyber-Physical Power Systems: Review of Smart Grid Security, Optimization, and Decision Support', Applied IT & Engineering, 1(1), pp. 1-9.
- Islam, Mohammad M.; Alharthi, Majed; Alkadi, Rotana S.; Islam, Rafiqul; Masum, Abdul Kadar Muhammad (2024) 'Crop yield prediction through machine learning: A path towards sustainable agriculture and climate resilience in Saudi Arabia', AIMS Agriculture and Food, 9(4), pp. 980-1003. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2024053
- Jia, Mengda; Komeily, Ali; Wang, Yueren; Srinivasan, Ravi S. (2019) 'Adopting Internet of Things for the development of smart buildings: A review of enabling technologies and applications', Automation in Construction, 101, pp. 111-126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.023
- Kashem, Mohammad Abul; Shamsuddoha, Mohammad; Nasir, Tasnuba (2025) 'Digitalization in Sustainable Transportation Operations: A Systematic Review of AI, IoT, and Blockchain Applications for Future Mobility', Future Transportation, 5(4), pp. 157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040157
- Kitchin, R. (2016) 'Getting smarter about smart cities: Improving data privacy and data security'. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/27367984/Getting_smarter_about_smart_cities_Improving_data_privacy_and_data_security
- Kyriaki, Elli; Giama, Effrosyni; Theodoridou, Ifigeneia (2025) 'Machine learning, artificial intelligence and digital twins: an up-to-date review analysis of the latest- era technologies in the urban building sector', International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 44(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2025.2544238
- Ma, S., Flanigan, K. A., and Bergés, M. (2024) 'State-of-the-Art Review: The Use of Digital Twins to Support Artificial Intelligence-Guided Predictive Maintenance', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13117
- Mahor, Vinod; Bijrothiya, Sadhna; Mishra, Rina; Rawat, Romil; Soni, Alpesh (2022) 'The Smart City Based on AI and Infrastructure', Autonomous Vehicles Volume 1, pp. 277-295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119871989.ch15
- Mazzetto, Silvia (2024) 'A Review of Urban Digital Twins Integration, Challenges, and Future Directions in Smart City Development', Sustainability, 16(19), pp. 8337. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198337
- Mehan, Asma (2026) 'Urban Artificial Intelligence in Mobility Infrastructure: Lessons for Just and Inclusive Cities', Contesti. Città, territori, progetti, (2), pp. 150-167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-16690
- Mehryar, Sara; Yazdanpanah, Vahid; Tong, Jeffrey (2024) 'AI and climate resilience governance', iScience, 27(6), pp. 109812. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109812
- Meng, Xianghui; Zhu, Lingling (2024) 'Augmenting cybersecurity in smart urban energy systems through IoT and blockchain technology within the Digital Twin framework', Sustainable Cities and Society, 106, pp. 105336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105336
- Mensah, Philip (2025) 'AI Governance Models in Smart Cities', AI in Business Management. Productivity Press, pp. 188-220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003614074-8
- Mhlanga, David (2026) 'Artificial Intelligence in smart cities: implications for urban governance in Africa', Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.1835768
- Mkhitaryan, Khoren; Hovhannisyan, Arevik; Ordyan, Armenuhi; Harutyunyan, Hayk; Kirakosyan, Edgar (2026) 'Digital and AI-Enabled Public Procurement in Smart Cities: A Governance Efficiency Framework', Urban Science, 10(6), pp. 296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10060296
- Mondal, Subhra; Das, Subhankar; Vrana, Vasiliki G. (2024) 'Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving a Net Zero Carbon Economy in Emerging Economies: A Combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA Approaches to Digital Inclusion and Climate Resilience', Sustainability, 16(23), pp. 10299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310299
- Mousavi, Yalda; Gharineiat, Zahra; Karimi, Armin Agha; McDougall, Kevin; Rossi, Adriana; Gonizzi Barsanti, Sara (2024) 'Digital Twin Technology in Built Environment: A Review of Applications, Capabilities and Challenges', Smart Cities, 7(5), pp. 2594-2615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7050101
- Mylonas, Georgios; Kalogeras, Athanasios; Kalogeras, Georgios; Anagnostopoulos, Christos; Alexakos, Christos; Munoz, Luis (2021) 'Digital Twins From Smart Manufacturing to Smart Cities: A Survey', IEEE Access, 9, pp. 143222-143249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3120843
- Najafi, Hamed; Lagerwall, Gareth Lynton; Obeysekera, Jayantha; Liu, Jason (2026) 'Machine Learning in Climate Downscaling: A Critical Review of Methodologies, Physical Consistency, and Operational Applications', Water, 18(2), pp. 271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020271
- Neset, Tina-Simone; Vrotsou, Katerina; Andersson, Lotta; Navarra, Carlo; Schück, Fredrik; Edström, Magnus Mateo; Rydholm, Caroline; Villaro, Clara Greve; Kucher, Kostiantyn; Linnér, Björn-Ola (2024) 'Artificial intelligence in support of weather warnings and climate adaptation', Climate Risk Management, 46, pp. 100673. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100673
- Nikpour, M., et al. (2023) 'Intelligent Energy Management with IoT Framework in Smart Cities Using Intelligent Analysis: An Application of Machine Learning Methods for Complex Networks and Systems', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05567
- NIST (2025) Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-2e2025.pdf
- O’Dwyer, Edward; Pan, Indranil; Acha, Salvador; Shah, Nilay (2019) 'Smart energy systems for sustainable smart cities: Current developments, trends and future directions', Applied Energy, 237, pp. 581-597. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.024
- Olawade, David B.; Wada, Ojima Z.; David-Olawade, Aanuoluwapo Clement; Fapohunda, Oluwaseun; Ige, Abimbola O.; Ling, Jonathan (2024) 'Artificial intelligence potential for net zero sustainability: Current evidence and prospects', Next Sustainability, 4, pp. 100041. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100041
- Omefe, S., Lawal, S. A., Bello, S. F., Balogun, A. K., Taiwo, I., and Ifiora, K. N. (2021) 'AI-augmented decision support system for sustainable transportation and supply chain management: A review', Communication In Physical Sciences, 7(4), pp. 630-642. Available at: https://journalcps.com/index.php/volumes/article/view/650
- Pan, Youqin (2025) 'The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving Smart Sustainability and Mitigating Climate Change in Urban Contexts', Urban Sustainability. Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 25-55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1645-2_2
- Rad, Arefeh Mortzavi; Karlsen, Elsa Haagensen; Nazar, Mohammed (2025) 'Unleashing the Potential of AI in Sustainable Urban Planning and Design', Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 1625-1634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69626-8_135
- Rajawat, Anand Singh; Mohammed, Omair; Shaw, Rabindra Nath; Ghosh, Ankush (2022) 'Renewable energy system for industrial internet of things model using fusion-AI', Applications of AI and IOT in Renewable Energy. Elsevier, pp. 107-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91699-8.00006-1
- Ramu, Swarna Priya; Boopalan, Parimala; Pham, Quoc-Viet; Maddikunta, Praveen Kumar Reddy; Huynh-The, Thien; Alazab, Mamoun; Nguyen, Thanh Thi; Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy (2022) 'Federated learning enabled digital twins for smart cities: Concepts, recent advances, and future directions', Sustainable Cities and Society, 79, pp. 103663. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103663
- Rui, Jin; Shabrina, Zahratu; Gong, Wenjing (2026) 'Artificial intelligence applications in urban extreme heat management: A systematic review of forecasting, monitoring, mitigation and decision support', Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 119, pp. 108363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108363
- Sachdeva, S., Hsu, A., French, I., and Lim, E. (2021) 'How are cities pledging net-zero? A computational approach to analyzing subnational climate strategies', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11207
- Sacoto-Cabrera, Erwin J.; Perez-Torres, Antonio; Tello-Oquendo, Luis; Cerrada, Mariela (2025) 'IoT, AI, and Digital Twins in Smart Cities: A Systematic Review for a Thematic Mapping and Research Agenda', Smart Cities, 8(5), pp. 175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8050175
- Sadri, Habib; Yitmen, Ibrahim; Tagliabue, Lavinia Chiara; Westphal, Florian; Tezel, Algan; Taheri, Afshin; Sibenik, Goran (2023) 'Integration of Blockchain and Digital Twins in the Smart Built Environment Adopting Disruptive Technologies—A Systematic Review', Sustainability, 15(4), pp. 3713. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043713
- Sanusi, Basit O. (2025) 'Smart Infrastructure: Leveraging IoT and AI for Predictive Maintenance in Urban Facilities', SAMRIDDHI : A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 17(02), pp. 26-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18090/samriddhi.v17i02.06
- Sebastian, Rizal (2024) 'Sustainable Engineering of Future Urban Systems: An Inclusive Approach Toward Livable, Climate-Neutral, and Productive Smart Cities', Green Energy and Technology. Springer International Publishing, pp. 319-330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47215-2_18
- Seidu, Sakibu; Chan, Daniel W.M.; Oyewole, Margaret Damilola; Jayasena, Nimesha Sahani; Oyesomo, Oyewole (2025) 'Leveraging digital technologies and machine learning for climate resilient buildings: modelling the role of dynamic drivers in mitigating critical barriers', Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, pp. 1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-06-2025-0328
- Sepasgozar, Samad M. E. (2021) 'Differentiating Digital Twin from Digital Shadow: Elucidating a Paradigm Shift to Expedite a Smart, Sustainable Built Environment', Buildings, 11(4), pp. 151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040151
- Shulajkovska, Miljana; Smerkol, Maj; Noveski, Gjorgji; Gams, Matjaž (2024) 'Enhancing Urban Sustainability: Developing an Open-Source AI Framework for Smart Cities', Smart Cities, 7(5), pp. 2670-2701. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7050104
- Simionescu, Mihaela; Strielkowski, Wadim (2025) 'The role of the Internet of Things in enhancing sustainable urban energy systems: A review of lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic', Journal of Urban Technology, 32(1), pp. 103-132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2024.2411932
- Singh, Shivam; Goyal, Manish Kumar (2023) 'Enhancing climate resilience in businesses: The role of artificial intelligence', Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, pp. 138228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138228
- Sirmacek, Beril; Vinuesa, Ricardo (2022) 'Remote sensing and AI for building climate adaptation applications', Results in Engineering, 15, pp. 100524. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100524
- Srivastava, Aman; Maity, Rajib (2023) 'Assessing the Potential of AI–ML in Urban Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Development', Sustainability, 15(23), pp. 16461. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316461
- Stephen, Seyi; Aigbavboa, Clinton; Oke, Ayodeji (2025) 'Revolutionising Green Construction: Harnessing Zeolite and AI-Driven Initiatives for Net-Zero and Climate-Adaptive Buildings', Buildings, 15(6), pp. 885. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060885
- Strubell, Emma; Ganesh, Ananya; McCallum, Andrew (2019) 'Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP', Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3645-3650. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1355
- Subramanian, Malliga; Cho, Jaehyuk; Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy, Sathishkumar; Murugesan, Akash; Chinnasamy, Ramya (2023) 'Enhancing Sustainable Transportation: AI-Driven Bike Demand Forecasting in Smart Cities', Sustainability, 15(18), pp. 13840. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813840
- Tabassi, Elham (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.). Available at: https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.ai.100-1
- Tandon, Neha; Shaheen, Momina (2024) 'AI-Driven Innovations for Environmental Sustainability Across Sectors', Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability. IGI Global, pp. 429-454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6336-2.ch017
- Temple, Lucy; Viale Pereira, Gabriela; Klausner, Lukas Daniel (2024) 'Unravelling the Use of Digital Twins to Assist Decision- and Policy-Making in Smart Cities', Resilience Through Digital Innovation: Enabling the Twin Transition, pp. 755-764. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2024.45
- Thuraka, B. (2021) 'AI-Driven Adaptive Route Optimization for Sustainable Urban Logistics and Supply Chain Management', International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(3), pp. 667-684.
- Tingzon, I., Toriumi, Y., and Gevaert, C. (2025) 'AI-Derived Structural Building Intelligence for Urban Resilience: An Application in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18182
- van Deursen, Alexander JAM; van Dijk, Jan AGM (2018) 'The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access', New Media & Society, 21(2), pp. 354-375. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
- Varzeshi, Shabnam; Fien, John; Irajifar, Leila (2026) 'Integrating Smart City Technologies and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Urban Planning and Design', Smart Cities, 9(1), pp. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities9010002
- Vergara-Perucich, Jose Francisco (2025) 'AI-Driven Deconstruction of Urban Regulatory Frameworks: Unveiling Social Sustainability Gaps in Santiago’s Communal Zoning', Urban Science, 9(6), pp. 186. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9060186
- Vishwakarma, Suresh; Tyagi, Ruchi; Rathod, Manish K (2025) 'Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies in Future Smart Cities', 2025 IEEE 1st International Conference on Smart Innovations in Systems, Infrastructure, Mechanical, Power, AI and Computing Technologies (SISIMPACT), pp. 1640-1646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/sisimpact67725.2025.11439495
- Waqas Khan, Muhammad; Saad, Syed; Ammad, Syed; Rasheed, Kumeel; Jamal, Qaiser (2024) 'Smart Infrastructure and AI', AI in Material Science. CRC Press, pp. 193-215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003438489-9
- Waymo (2026) Welcoming our first riders in Denver, San Diego, and Tampa. Available at: https://blog.waymo.com/blog/2026/09/ride-in-denver-san-diego-tampa/?
- Weber-Lewerenz, Bianca Christina; Traverso, Marzia (2023) 'Navigating Applied Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Digital Era: How Smart Buildings and Smart Cities Become the Key to Sustainability', Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 1(4), pp. 214-227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewaia32021063
- World Resources Institute, C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, and ICLEI (2021) Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories: An Accounting and Reporting Standard for Cities, Version 1.1.
- Xu, H., Omitaomu, F., Sabri, S., et al. (2024) 'Leveraging Generative AI for Urban Digital Twins: A Scoping Review on the Autonomous Generation of Urban Data, Scenarios, Designs, and 3D City Models for Smart City Advancement', arXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19464
- Yahia, Abul Kashem Mohammad; Shahjalal, Mohammad; Rahaman, Taufiqur (2025) 'AI-driven sustainable infrastructure: Smart materials for climate-resilient urban design', American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 1(1), pp. 438-466. Available at: https://doi.org/10.63125/mc5qpg12
- Yessef, Mourad; Hakam, Youness; Tabaa, Mohamed; Alammar, Mohammed M.; Elbarbary, Zakaria M.S. (2025) 'Digital twin technology in smart cities: A step toward intelligent urban management', Energy Reports, 14, pp. 5539-5557. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.097
- Yigitcanlar, Tan; Kamruzzaman, Md.; Foth, Marcus; Sabatini-Marques, Jamile; da Costa, Eduardo; Ioppolo, Giuseppe (2019) 'Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature', Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, pp. 348-365. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
- Yigitcanlar, Tan; Desouza, Kevin C.; Mossberger, Karen; Cheong, Pauline H.; Li, Rita Yi Man; Mehmood, Rashid; Corchado, Juan M. (2025) 'Artificial Intelligence and the City: An Editorial Perspective', Journal of Urban Technology, 32(3), pp. 1-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2025.2500822
How to cite this article
Afre, R.A., Thakre, B.B., Panchal, R. and Kadam, S. (2026). 'Artificial Intelligence for Net-Zero and Climate-Resilient Sustainable Cities: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives'. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Cities, 1, pp. 221-252. https://doi.org/10.65582/aifsc.2026.013
