navOS
navOS
Skip to content
Caravel Press
Account
Green Technology & Innovation
Submit your article
  • Current issue
  • All issues
  • All articles
  • Subscribe to alerts
  • Aims and scope
  • Editorial board
  • Announcements
  • How this journal works
  • Guide for authors
  • Manuscript template
  • Charges and waivers
  • Open access and licence
  • How peer review works

Our journals

  • Energy Catalyst
  • Green Technology & Innovation
  • Global Decarbonisation
  • Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Cities
  • Research and Reviews in Sustainability

Across the press

  • All journals
  • All articles
  • New research feed
  • DOI and licence checker
  • The record, for machines

Publish with us

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author guidelines
  • Open access

Before you submit

  • Editorial policies
  • Peer review
  • Publication ethics
  • Licensing
  • Copyright
  • Charges
  • Funder requirements

What we can publish for you

  • Journal hosting
  • Books
  • Conference proceedings

How it works

  • All services
  • Support for your editors
  • navOS, the platform
  • Contact us

The press

  • About us
  • Editorial policies
  • Community
  • navOS, the platform

For reviewers

  • For reviewers
  • Apply to review
  • Check a certificate

Help

  • Support
  • Contact us
Caravel Press
Green Technology & Innovation

Articles and issues

  • Current issue
  • All issues
  • All articles
  • Subscribe to alerts

About

  • Aims and scope
  • Editorial board
  • Announcements
  • How this journal works

For authors

  • Guide for authors
  • Manuscript template
  • Charges and waivers
  • Open access and licence
  • How peer review works
Submit your article
  • Browse
    • Our journals

      • Energy Catalyst
      • Green Technology & Innovation
      • Global Decarbonisation
      • Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Cities
      • Research and Reviews in Sustainability
    • Across the press

      • All journals
      • All articles
      • New research feed
      • DOI and licence checker
      • The record, for machines
  • For authors
    • Publish with us

      • Submit a manuscript
      • Author guidelines
      • Open access
    • Before you submit

      • Editorial policies
      • Peer review
      • Publication ethics
      • Licensing
      • Copyright
      • Charges
      • Funder requirements
  • Services
    • What we can publish for you

      • Journal hosting
      • Books
      • Conference proceedings
    • How it works

      • All services
      • Support for your editors
      • navOS, the platform
      • Contact us
  • About
    • The press

      • About us
      • Editorial policies
      • Community
      • navOS, the platform
    • For reviewers

      • For reviewers
      • Apply to review
      • Check a certificate
    • Help

      • Support
      • Contact us
  • Your account

Contents

  • 1Introduction
    • 1.1 Technical Field
    • 1.2 Background Technology
    • 1.3 Experiment on Salt Diffusion in Indoor Solar Ponds
    • 1.4 Experimental Observations:
    • 1.5 Analysis of Experimental Results:
  • 2Structure of the Aerial Solar Pond
    • 2.1 Technical Scheme
    • 2.2 Working Principle of the Aerial Solar Pond Window
  • 3Optical Parameter Testing of Aerial Solar Ponds
    • 3.1 Optical Parameters of the Components: Visible Light Transmittance and Direct Solar Light Transmittance
    • 3.2 Optical Parameters of Components: Infrared Transmittance Testing Date: November 30, 2015
    • 3.3 Optical Parameters of Components: Direct Solar Infrared Transmittance
    • 3.4 Direct Solar Infrared Transmittance under Different Mediums
    • 3.5 Optical Response of Aerial Solar Pond
  • 4Engineering Technology Evaluation
    • 4.1 Optical Evaluation
    • 4.2 Sealing Performance Evaluation
    • 4.3 Mechanical Performance Evaluation
    • 4.4 Weather Resistance Evaluation
    • 4.5 Processing Requirements
    • 4.6 Comparability with Similar Products and Economic Evaluation
  • 5Discussion
    • 5.1 Optical Distortion
    • 5.2 Digital and Sterile Filling Process
  • 6Conclusion
    • Declarations
      • References

        In this article

        • Figures18
          • Fig. 1. Laboratory 1: Divided into three groups, each containing 11 p...
          • Fig. 2. Laboratory 2: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 p...
          • Fig. 3. Laboratory 3: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 p...
          • Fig. 4. Cross-sectional view of the aerial solar pond
          • Fig. 5. Data 17 curves
          • Fig. 6. Data 16 curves
          • Fig. 7. Data comparison curve
          • Fig. 8. Data 276 curves
          • Fig. 9. Data 277 curves
          • Fig. 10. Data 276 compares the figures with Data 277
          • Fig. 11. Schematic diagram of the studio
          • Fig. 12. South Balcony
          • Fig. 13. Southeast bedroom
          • Fig. 14. East bathroom
          • Fig. 15. Northeast bedroom
          • Fig. 16. Northeast kitchen
          • Fig. 17. Northeast bathroom
          • Fig. 18. Subject photographed in balcony area
        • Tables3
          • Table 1. Visible light transmittance ratio test record. Date: 3.12.2013
          • Table 2. Direct sunlight transmits more than testing record. Date: 3.1...
          • Table 3. List of Aerial Solar Pond Engineering Glass
        Caravel Press
        Green Technology & Innovation

        Volume 2, 2026, Article 2026.002

        Green Technology & Innovation cover

        Technical Article

        Research on aerial solar pond engineering technology

        , , , ,

        1The Shouguang Marine and Fisheries Development Center, Weifang, Shandong Province, China

        2Xuanyi Home Technology Co., Ltd., Shahe City, Hebei Province, China

        3Shandong Meixin Glass Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong, China

        4Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Haidian District, China

        * Correspondence: Cao Jinlong, [email protected]

        Published
        3 February 2026
        Pages
        3-24
        Received
        9 December 2025
        Revised
        5 January 2026
        Accepted
        24 January 2026
        DOI
        10.65582/gti.2026.002
        Access
        Open access, CC BY 4.0
        Published 3 February 2026·Pages 3-24doi.org/10.65582/gti.2026.002
        Received 9 Dec 2025·Revised 5 Jan 2026·Accepted 24 Jan 2026Open accessunder CC BY 4.0
        Download PDF22 pages · 10.6 MBCheck for updates

        Abstract

        On August 1, 2023, the world's first aerial solar pond assembly system was launched at the Weifang University Science and Technology Park in China.This research facility takes an area of 155.3 m2 and incorporates 43 solar pond engineering glass panels with a total lighting area of 20 m2. The visible light transmittance is 79.62%, the direct solar light transmittance is 63.22%, the infrared light transmittance is 16.6%, and the direct infrared solar light transmittance is 35.4%. For the triple-glazed double- cavity structure, the visible light transmittance exceeds 88%, and the average infrared light blocking rate is as high as 84%. In the mid and far-infrared radiation segments, the infrared blocking rate is nearly 100%. During a full operational period (365 days), the system demonstrated excellent performance on lighting, heat collection, and thermal insulation, and maintained a cool environment in summer and a warm one in winter. This article provides a concise overview of the sealing performance, mechanical properties, weather resistance, and comparability with similar products of solar pond glass. It outlines the processing requirements for solar pond engineering glass, identifies issues that require further research, and presents interim research findings.

        Keywords. Aerial Solar Pond; Assembly System; Lighting; Thermal Insulation; Cool Summer; Warm Winter

        1. Introduction

        1.1. Technical Field

        This research involves solar pond engineering technology, specifically aerial solar pond technology applied for indoor lighting, heat collection, heat storage, thermal insulation, and temperature maintenance. This innovative approach breaks away from the traditional ground-based solar pond applications, creatively expanding the spatial application of solar ponds.

        1.2. Background Technology

        In natural environments, any pool that can collect and store solar energy and use it as a heat source is called a solar pond. Typically, it is composed of three layers: the Upper Convective Zone (UCZ) with freshwater, the Non-Convective Zone (NCZ) characterized by a salt concentration gradient, also known as the thermal insulating layer, and the Lower Convective Zone (LCZ) with uniform convection and saturated salt concentration. The heat collection mechanism of a solar pond relies on the salt gradient in the middle layer, which acts as a transparent thermal insulator. This layer permits short-wave solar radiation to penetrate and heat the lower convective zone while insulating the heat storage area from the air above, thereby reducing heat loss to the air.

        Supported by this theory, our team conducted studies on the thermal stability of unsaturated solar ponds and the rate of salt diffusion. In experiments with two sets of solar ponds of equal salinity, both injected with freshwater layers of equal depth, it was observed that in outdoor ponds exposed to sunlight, the lower layer consistently maintained a higher temperature than the upper layer. Conversely, in indoor ponds where sunlight strikes the surface at an angle, the upper layer was warmer than the lower layer. This phenomenon demonstrates that solar ponds are capable of heat collection, storage, and insulation.

        1.3. Experiment on Salt Diffusion in Indoor Solar Ponds

        Time: Winter 2006 to Winter 2007

        Location: Indoor Laboratories 1–3 at the Solar Pond Experimental Base in Shouguang City, Shandong Province.

        Nine groups of solar ponds were set up indoors, each with a depth of 80 cm and a surface area of 0.4 m². To facilitate observation of the freshwater layer mixing, the freshwater was dyed black.

        <strong><em>Figure 1</em>.</strong> Laboratory 1: Divided into three groups, each containing 11 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, and 2.0 cm, respectively.
        Fig. 1. Laboratory 1: Divided into three groups, each containing 11 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, and 2.0 cm, respectively. Full size
        <strong><em>Figure 2</em>.</strong> Laboratory 2: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 2‰, 3‰, 4‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 3.0 cm, 4.0 cm, and 5.0 cm, respectively.
        Fig. 2. Laboratory 2: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 2‰, 3‰, 4‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 3.0 cm, 4.0 cm, and 5.0 cm, respectively. Full size
        <strong><em>Figure 3</em>.</strong> Laboratory 3: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 2‰, 3‰, 4‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 6.0 cm, 7.0 cm, and 8.0 cm, respectively.
        Fig. 3. Laboratory 3: Divided into three groups, each containing 13 ponds. Salinity levels were 1‰, 2‰, 3‰, 4‰, 5‰, 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰, 35‰, 40‰, and 50‰. Freshwater was added to each group at depths of 6.0 cm, 7.0 cm, and 8.0 cm, respectively. Full size

        Temperature and salinity changes were monitored at fixed points and intervals within the vertical depth to investigate the effects of salt concentration and temperature on salt diffusion rates under natural environmental conditions.

        1.4. Experimental Observations:

        Group 1: Freshwater depth of 0.5 cm.

        • In the 1‰ pond, horizontal surface diffusion was slow, but vertical diffusion was rapid. After 3 hours, diffusion had progressed to 3/5 of the vertical depth. Conductivity measurements taken on-site with a U.S. Thermal Company conductivity meter showed no gradient between the upper and lower layers.
        • In the 5‰ pond, after freshwater addition, horizontal surface diffusion was rapid, while vertical sinking was not significant. After 5 minutes, the dyed freshwater layer had only diffused to a depth of 10 cm.
        • The final diffusion completion time for this group was 19 days.

        Group 2: Freshwater depth of 1.0 cm.

        • In the 1‰ pond, horizontal surface diffusion was slow, but vertical diffusion was rapid. The freshwater sank 32 cm within 1 minute, and after 5 minutes, the dyed layer stabilized at a depth of 15 cm. After 12 hours, no gradient was detected between the upper and lower layers.
        • In the 5‰ pond, after freshwater addition, horizontal surface diffusion was rapid, but vertical sinking was minimal. After 5 minutes, the dyed layer stabilized at a depth of 5 cm.
        • The final diffusion completion time for this group was 37 days.

        Group 3: Freshwater depth of 2 cm.

        • In the 1‰ pond, the freshwater sank 32 cm within 1 minute, and the black dye at the bottom decomposed rapidly.
        • The final diffusion completion time for this group was 78 days.

        Group 4: Freshwater depth of 3 cm.

        • In the 1‰ pond, after 48 hours, a gradient was observed only in the top 4 cm. After 8 days, the gradient layer remained unchanged. After 15 days, it decreased by 1 cm. After 21 days, diffusion was complete, with pond temperatures ranging from 4.0°C to 6.0°C during this period.
        • The final diffusion completion times for ponds with salinities of 10‰, 15‰, and 20‰ were 136 days.
        • For higher-salinity ponds, diffusion completion times were 129 days for 25‰ and 35‰, 122 days for 35‰ and 40‰, and 107 days for 50‰. This anomaly was attributed to sunlight entering through windows, creating a temperature gradient in the ponds and accelerating diffusion in ponds closer to the windows.

        Groups 5–9: Similar phenomena were observed. Detailed parameters are recorded in the indoor pond salt diffusion progress table and the attached indoor pond salt diffusion records.

        1.5. Analysis of Experimental Results:

        In Group 1, with a freshwater depth of 0.5 cm, the 20‰ pond (including ponds with salinities ranging from 5‰ to 50‰) completed diffusion in 19 days.

        In Group 9, the 20‰ pond with a freshwater depth of 8 cm completed diffusion in 254 days.

        These results can be interpreted as the time required for bottom water to overcome the salinity gradient and reach the surface within the 80 cm vertical depth, which was 19 days and 254 days, respectively.

        The data indicate that solar ponds exhibit excellent thermal insulation properties. Their insulation effectiveness is determined by the thickness of the freshwater layer, pond depth, and the magnitude of the salinity gradient.

        Inspired by these experiments, we propose a novel theory for the application of aerial solar ponds and subsequently invent the aerial solar ponds.

        2. Structure of the Aerial Solar Pond

        The technical objective of the aerial solar pond is to address the limitations of existing technologies by providing a solar pond window that combines the functions of daylighting, heat collection, heat storage, thermal insulation, temperature maintenance, and light control. Its integrated engineering design significantly enhances the heat collection, thermal insulation, soundproofing, and dust reduction capabilities of architectural spaces.

        2.1. Technical Scheme

        In January 2005, we completed the pilot test of this project using a four-glass three-cavity design. The internal structure comprises a sealed and transparent window body, with transparent partitions arranged vertically, dividing the inner cavity into at least three completely isolated medium-filled layers, namely, the outer, middle and inner layers. The middle layer is filled with air, argon gas, or vacuum-sealed, while the outer and inner layers are filled with a transparent thermal insulation liquid.

        The front of the aerial solar pond window can have a rectangular or any other geometric shape. The outer and inner layers are filled with a transparent thermal insulation liquid which is antifreeze.

        The thickness of the transparent thermal insulation liquid in the outer and inner layers ranges from 3 to 20 mm. The thickness of the vacuum, argon gas, or air layer ranges from 6 to 30 mm.

        The outer and inner layers are equipped with inlets for the transparent thermal insulation liquid and outlets for gas release.

        To prevent visible light from entering the room during summer, a reflective film curtain is installed on the inside of the inner layer.

        2.2. Working Principle of the Aerial Solar Pond Window

        Figure 4 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of the aerial solar pond.

        C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Roaming\CadViewerDataVE\CT3Cache\阴影图.jpg
        Fig. 4. Cross-sectional view of the aerial solar pond Full size
        1. Window body 2. Transparent cover plate 3. Transparent cover plate 4. Outer layer 5. Middle layer 6. Inner layer 7. Transparent thermal insulation liquid 8. Inlet 9. Outlet 10. Inlet 11. Outlet

        The aerial solar pond window described in this invention features a sealed and transparent window body 1 with a rectangular front. Transparent partitions 2 and 3 are arranged vertically within the window body 1, dividing its inner cavity into three completely isolated medium-filled layers: outer layer 4, middle layer 5, and inner layer 6. The middle layer 5 is an air or argon gas layer with a thickness of 6 mm. The outer 4 and inner 6 layers are filled with a transparent thermal insulation liquid 7, with the outer layer having a thickness of 6 mm and the inner layer a thickness of 20 mm. The outer layer 4 is equipped with inlets 8 and outlets 9 for the transparent thermal insulation liquid 7, while the inner layer 6 has its own inlets 10 and outlets 11.

        3. Optical Parameter Testing of Aerial Solar Ponds

        On December 3, 2013, November 30, 2015, January 17, 2024, and March 26, 2024, we commissioned the National Glass Quality Inspection Center to conduct optical testing on different structures of the solar pond window components. The results are as follows:

        3.1. Optical Parameters of the Components: Visible Light Transmittance and Direct Solar Light Transmittance

        Testing Date: December 3, 2013

        Sample Specifications and Quantity: 100×50 mm, 1 piece Sample Structure: Four-glass three-cavity Cross-link Dimensions: 4 mm (G) + 10 mm (medium) + 4 mm (G) + 6 mm (A) + 4 mm (G)

        Test Parameters: See Table 1 for the Visible Light Transmittance Test Record and Table 2 for the Direct Solar Light Transmittance Test Record.

        Test Results: Visible light transmittance is 79.62% (Table 1); direct solar light transmittance is 63.22% (Table 2).

        Table 1. Visible light transmittance ratio test record. Date: 3.12.2013

        Sample IDQT2013-37Sample Specification and Thickness (mm)100*50
        4+10+4+6A+4
        Name and Number of Instrument Equipment UsedUV/Visible Spectrophotometer QCTC-A-001Color Code
        Sample Number
        Transmittance at Each WavelengthWavelength (nm)Measured Value (%)Wavelength (nm)Wavelength (nm)
        78072.789780780
        770
        760
        750
        740
        730
        720
        710
        700
        690
        680
        670
        660
        650
        640
        630
        620
        610
        600
        590
        580
        570
        560
        550
        540
        530
        520
        510
        500
        490
        480
        470
        460
        450
        440
        430
        420
        410
        400
        390
        380
        77072.99770
        76073.3760
        75073.578750
        74073.725740
        73074.495730
        72075.543720
        71076.128710
        70076.749700
        69077.367690
        68077.554680
        67077.821670
        66078.28660
        65078.248650
        64078.52640
        63078.819630
        62078.918620
        61079.302610
        60079.304600
        59079.256590
        58079.724580
        57080.05570
        56079.969560
        55079.853550
        54079.814540
        53079.797530
        52079.684520
        51079.882510
        50079.709500
        49079.531490
        48079.515480
        47079.267470
        46079.143460
        45078.84450
        44078.445440
        43077.849430
        42077.664420
        41077.402410
        40076.234400
        39074.558390
        38071.285380
        Visible Light Transmittance (%)79.62
        Average Visible Light Transmittance (%)
        Maximum Difference in Visible Light Transmittance (%)
        Conclusion

        Table 2. Direct sunlight transmits more than testing record. Date: 3.12.2013.

        Sample numberQT2013-37Sample specification and thickness (mm)100*504+10+4+6A+4
        Instrument name and number usedUV/Visible Spectrophotometer QCTC-A-001Color code
        Sample number
        Transmittance at each wavelengthWavelength (nm)Measured value (%)Wavelength (nm)Measured value (%)Wavelength (nm)Measured value (%)
        35035.708350350
        40076.234400400
        45078.840450450
        50079.709500500
        55079.853550550
        60079.304600600
        65078.248650650
        70076.749700700
        75073.578750750
        80072.427800800
        85070.059850850
        90067.530900900
        95053.642950950
        100048.18710001000
        105048.84110501050
        110058.29211001100
        115027.46611501150
        120021.01112001200
        125024.50212501250
        130019.99613001300
        13503.53313501350
        14000.00014001400
        14500.00014501450
        15000.00015001500
        15500.00115501550
        16000.05816001600
        16500.22416501650
        17000.28717001700
        17500.08217501750
        18000.06318001800
        Direct transmittance of solar light (%)63.22
        Average direct transmittance of solar light (%)
        Maximum difference in direct transmittance of solar light (%)
        Conclusion

        3.2. Optical Parameters of Components: Infrared Transmittance Testing Date: November 30, 2015

        Sample Specifications and Quantity: 300×300×30 mm, 1 piece Sample Structure: Four-glass three-cavity

        Cross-link Dimensions: 4 mm (G) + 4 mm (medium) + 4 mm (G) + 6 mm (A) + 4 mm (G) + 4 mm (medium) + 4 mm (G)

        Testing Requirements: According to ISO 9050:2003, values were taken every 50 nm from 800 nm to 2500 nm, and averaged

        Testing Results: infrared transmittance was 16.6%

        3.3. Optical Parameters of Components: Direct Solar Infrared Transmittance

        Testing Date: January 10, 2024

        Sample Specifications and Quantity: 350×200 mm, 2 pieces Sample Structure: Three-glass two-cavity Sample 017 Cross-link Dimensions: 5 mm (G) + 6 mm (Liquid) + 5 mm (G) + 20 mm (AR) + 5 mm (G)

        Testing Requirements: Insulated and tested as a single piece Testing Standard: GB/T 2680-2021.05.13

        Testing Item: Direct solar infrared transmittance Testing Results: 46.5%

        The detailed solar infrared transmission curve for aerial solar pond sample 017(Figure 5) shows visible light transmittance greater than 80%, with mid to far infrared transmittance near zero. This optical performance is highly promising and significantly ahead of others.

        A graph of a blue line AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 5. Data 17 curves Full size
        Data 16 curves
        Fig. 6. Data 16 curves Full size

        The detailed solar infrared transmission curve for aerial solar pond sample 017(Figure 5) shows visible light transmittance greater than 80%, with mid to far infrared transmittance near zero. This optical performance is highly promising and significantly ahead of others.

        Sample 016:

        Testing Date: January 10, 2024

        Sample Specifications and Quantity: 350×200 mm, 2 pieces Sample Structure: Three-glass two-cavity

        Sample 016 Cross-link Dimensions: 5 mm (G) + 6 mm (AR) + 5 mm (G) + 20 mm (Liquid) + 5 mm (G) Testing Requirements: Insulated and tested as a single piece

        Testing Item: Direct solar infrared transmittance Testing Standard: GB/T 2680-2021.05.13 Testing Results: 35.4%

        The curve for data 016 is shown in Figure 6, and it shows visible light transmittance is over 80%, with near-infrared blocking ratio greater than data 017. Mid and far infrared blocking ratio is nearly 100%. By contrasting the curves of data 016 and 017, the key factor affecting visible light transmittance and infrared blocking is the thickness of the thermal insulation medium, as shown in Figure 7.

        Data comparison curve
        Fig. 7. Data comparison curve Full size
        Data 276 curves
        Fig. 8. Data 276 curves Full size

        3.4. Direct Solar Infrared Transmittance under Different Mediums

        Testing Date: March 26, 2024;Sample Specifications and Quantity: 350×200 mm, 2 pieces Sample Structure: Three-glass, two-cavity

        Sample 0276 Cross-link Dimensions: 5 mm (G) + 6 mm (Liquid) + 5 mm (G) + 20 mm (AR) + 5 mm (G) Testing Item: Direct solar infrared transmittance

        Testing Results: 48.0%;Sample 0277 Cross-link Dimensions: 5 mm (G) + 6 mm (AR) + 5 mm (G) + 20 mm (Liquid) + 5 mm (G) Testing Item: Direct solar infrared transmittance

        Testing Results: 37.0%

        The curve for data 277 shows slight variations due to changes in the medium, but the overall trend remains consistent, as illustrated in figure 10, which compares data 276(Figure 8) and 277(Figure 9).

        Data 277 curves
        Fig. 9. Data 277 curves Full size
        Data 276 compares the figures with Data 277
        Fig. 10. Data 276 compares the figures with Data 277 Full size

        3.5. Optical Response of Aerial Solar Pond

        Given the superior optical parameters of the solar pond glass panels, in the summer of 2023, we retrofitted the windows of a workshop in the University Technology Park in Weifang, Shandong, with solar pond engineering glass panels. The glass panels were produced by Shandong Meixin Glass Technology Co., Ltd., the window structures by Hebei Xunyi Doors and Windows Co., Ltd., and the medium filling was completed on-site.

        The workshop covers an area of 155.3 m², as shown in Figure 11. A total of 43 solar pond engineering glass panels, covering 20 m², were installed as shown in solar pond engineering glass table 3. Specific areas include:

        South balcony lighting area: 6.92×1.56 m² (Figure 12) Southeast bedroom lighting area: 1.75×1.56 m² (Figure 13) East bathroom lighting area: 0.92×1.56 m² (Figure 14) Northeast bedroom lighting area: 1.75×1.56 m² (Figure 15) Northeast kitchen lighting area: 3.62×1.56 m² (Figure 16) Northeast bathroom lighting area: 1.06×1.56 m² (Figure 17)

        M:\09FC6B30-22C3-449C-862D-DA38CD4C09CB\09FC6B30-22C3-449C-862D-DA38CD4C09CB_1.png
        Fig. 11. Schematic diagram of the studio Full size

        Table 3. List of Aerial Solar Pond Engineering Glass

        No.NameWHQ.Area ㎡PositionRemarksWT
        1049045010.22Southeast bedroomFixedC2
        2049045010.22Southeast bedroomFixedC4
        3051945010.23South balconyFixedC1
        4077045010.35East bathroomFixedC3
        5091045010.41Northeast bathroomFixedC6
        60104045010.47Southeast bedroomFixedC2
        70104045010.47Southeast bedroomFixedC4
        80113645010.51Northeast kitchenFixedC5
        90114945010.52South balconyFixedC1
        11055945020.5South balconyFixedC1
        12One of the holes109745020.99Northeast kitchenFixedC5
        130114845021.03South balconyFixedC1
        14031089010.28East bathroomFixedC3
        15042089010.37Northeast bathroomFixedC6
        16046589010.41Southeast bedroomFixedC2
        17046589010.41Southeast bedroomFixedC4
        18050589010.45Southeast bedroomFixedC2
        19050589010.45Southeast bedroomFixedC4
        20052089010.46South balconyFixedC1
        21049489020.88Northeast kitchenFixedC5
        22051989020.92South balconyFixedC1
        23053389020.95Northeast kitchenFixedC5
        24055989041.99South balconyFixedC1
        25032182110.26East bathroomFan glassC3
        26035182110.29Northeast bathroomFan glassC6
        27042182110.35Southeast bedroomFan glassC2
        28042182110.35Southeast bedroomFan glassC4
        29045082110.37South balconyFan glassC1
        30046382120.76Northeast kitchenFan glassC5
        31048982120.8South balconyFan glassC1
        16.67
        A diagram of a bar AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 12. South Balcony Full size
        A diagram of a window with measurements AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 13. Southeast bedroom Full size
        A diagram of a window AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 14. East bathroom Full size
        A diagram of a window with measurements AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 15. Northeast bedroom Full size
        A diagram of a window AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 16. Northeast kitchen Full size
        A diagram of a window AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 17. Northeast bathroom Full size

        During construction, special attention was given to the thermal insulation properties for the summer months. We utilized a three- glass, two-cavity cross-linked structure with the following configuration: 5 mm (G) + 6 mm (medium) + 5 mm (G) + 20 mm (AR) + 5 mm (G).

        On August 1, 2023, the workshop was officially operational, showcasing the following key optical and functional characteristics:

        3.5.1. 3.5.1.

        The visible light transmittance is excellent. The windows equipped with solar pond panels are so transparent that they appear as if no glass is present, making it nearly indistinguishable to the naked eye.

        3.5.2. 3.5.2.

        The outer cavity of the solar pond is filled with 6 mm of light-transmitting, thermal insulation liquid. Although this liquid absorbs infrared radiation and heats up, the heat is effectively dissipated through outdoor air convection, resulting in a comfortable indoor environment that remains cool in summer and warm in winter.

        3.5.3. 3.5.3.

        At 14:00 on February 7, 2025, the outdoor ambient temperature was -4.8°C, while the balcony temperature (without auxiliary heat sources) was 25°C, making it feel as warm as spring to the human body. See Figure 18.

        A person in a white coat sitting in a room AI-generated content may be incorrect.
        Fig. 18. Subject photographed in balcony area Full size

        4. Engineering Technology Evaluation

        4.1. Optical Evaluation

        The maximum visible light transmittance of the solar pond glass panel is 80.05%, as shown in Table 1; the peak direct solar transmittance reaches 79.304%. Within the spectral range of 1400 to 1800 nm, the transmittance varies between 0 and 0.063. The high transmittance in the visible spectrum coupled with the ultra-low transmittance in the infrared spectrum embodies the inventive essence of the aerial solar pond glass panel.

        4.2. Sealing Performance Evaluation

        A key aspect of ensuring the safe operation of aerial solar pond is the sealing performance between glass segments. While initial trials of aerial solar ponds were completed in 2003, the issue of glass sealing was not fully resolved until a collaboration with Shandong Meixin Glass Technology Co., Ltd. in 2023 successfully addressed this challenge.

        The advantages of this sealing process include:

        • Flexible and warm edge
        • Composite flexible material, free of metals and materials with high thermal conductivity, addresses heat dissipation at the edges of insulated glass, enhancing overall energy efficiency, and reduces the thermal conductivity of the spacer to 0.25 W/m·K.
        • Extreme airtightness
        • This technology achieves very low water vapor permeability and gas transmission rates, forming an effective and long-lasting barrier against moisture ingress and gas leakage.

        4.3. Mechanical Performance Evaluation

        Unique bonding.

        An unique bonding method and capability prevent seal failure in insulated glass due to butyl rubber overflow, tearing, or weak connections.

        Flammable material

        The flexible material, which can contract and expand easily, diminishes the image distortion caused by insufficient flatness of tempered glass.

        4.4. Weather Resistance Evaluation

        Since August 1, 2023, the aerial solar pond has undergone preliminary testing for one full cycle, enduring temperatures as high as 60°C and as low as -20°C. The three-glass two-cavity structure has shown no signs of gas leakage or medium seepage.

        4.5. Processing Requirements

        An aerial solar pond has exceptionally high transparency and excellent infrared blocking capabilities. Its digital manufacturing process must occur in a dust-free and sterile sealed workshop.

        4.6. Comparability with Similar Products and Economic Evaluation

        Currently, Low-E glass and rare earth-coated glass offer similar functions. However, these products require substantial resources and energy for manufacturing. In contrast, the key material for solar pond engineering glass is water, an inexhaustible and inexpensive natural resource. With 88% high transparency and 84% effective thermal insulation, it represents a unique strategic resource for global promotion.

        5. Discussion

        5.1. Optical Distortion

        Due to the filling medium, image magnification and distortion reduces the optical performance of the solar pond. Future product innovation should focus on mitigating these effects through multi-point glass connections and improving glass processing techniques.

        5.2. Digital and Sterile Filling Process

        Ensuring long-term cleanliness and high transparency of the glass requires a digitized and sterile filling process for adhesives and mediums. Current production lines urgently need improvements and enhancements.

        6. Conclusion

        The aerial solar pond engineering technology is an original green technology that builds upon traditional land-based solar pond thermal utilization systems. It breaks through conventional theoretical frameworks and innovatively establishes the aerial solar pond engineering technology. In natural environments, this technology utilizes sunlight to integrate lighting, heat collection, storage, insulation, dust removal, sound insulation, and thermal isolation into a single system. It stands at the forefront of promoting sustainable development in the construction industry for human society, significantly expanding the new frontiers of solar pond thermal utilization. This technology represents a groundbreaking advancement in the field of future energy systems with the potential to impact the world.

        The high transparency and thermal insulation efficiency of solar pond glass suggest extensive application prospects. The glass can be widely used in residential and commercial construction, greenhouse engineering, curtain walls, automobiles, yachts, trains, and low-altitude aircraft. With rapid technological advancements and strategic collaboration among scientists worldwide, aerial solar pond technology is poised to become a significant sustainable energy solution in a future green, low-carbon society.

        Declarations

        Author contributions. Cao Jinlong: independently completed the manuscript and revisions of the paper "Research on Aerial Solar Pond Engineering Technology." The main academic contributions are: For the first time, the land-based solar pond was moved to the air, achieving an innovation in the operational mechanism of solar ponds and expanding the new application fields of solar ponds. For the first time, the selective use of spectral bands by solar pond glass panels was achieved, enabling space to be warm in winter and cool in summer. For the first time, the formulation of medium concentration was completed. For the first time, the control of uniform medium thickness was achieved, overcoming image distortion. For the first time, the issue of microbial infection in the medium was resolved. The optical performance was tested by a third party according to international standards. Zhang Longhao: completed the 4SG cross-linking of the glass. Wang Huaiqi: completed the modular assembly of the solar pond glass panels and aluminium-wood structure. Ma Junjuan: completed the structural drawing of the window. Liu Junzhe: completed the English translation and proofreading of the manuscript.

        Funding. Early-stage research funding sources: Key Research Program of the Shandong Provincial Government, China Key Research Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China National 863 Program of China Local Government Scientific Research Fund Later-stage research funding. Self-supported funds.

        Conflicts of interest. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

        Data availability. The data presented in this paper were provided by a third-party testing institution, the National Glass Quality Supervision and Inspection Center of China.

        Acknowledgements. National 863 Program, National Science and Technology Support Program, and Shandong Province Major Research and Development Program

        References

        • Bandara, J.; Mielczarski, J.A.; Kiwi, J. (2001) 'I. Adsorption mechanism of chlorophenols on iron oxides, titanium oxide and aluminum oxide as detected by infrared spectroscopy', Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 34(4), pp. 307-320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(01)00224-7
        • Cao, J (1989) 'The experiment and study of technique for little prawn wintering with passive solar energy system', Potentialities of Agricultural Engineering in Rural Development.
        • Cao, J (1993a) 'Research on utilization of solar ponds technology on marine culture', In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Solar Ponds.
        • Cao, J (1993b) 'Wintering technique for parent prawns in all-weather solar pond', In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Solar Ponds.
        • Cao, J (2000) 'Scheme of Sunlight Project of Fifteen Coasts', Collected Works of Discussion on Clean Energy Technology of China.
        • Cao, Jinlong; Lu, Xiaoyan (2007) 'Study on Technique for Integrated Heating of A Solar Pond', Proceedings of ISES World Congress 2007 (Vol. I – Vol. V). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 2138-2150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_435
        • Collado, Francisco; Lowrey, Preston (1991) 'Temperature, thermal efficiency, and gradient performance from two seawater-SZ solar ponds', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 361-370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90051-w
        • de Jongh, P.E., Vanmaekelbergh, D. and Kelly, J.J (1999) 'Cu₂O: A catalyst for the electrochemical decomposition of water.'.
        • Folchitto, Sergio (1991) 'Seawater as salt and water source for Solar Ponds', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 343-351. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90049-3
        • Hara, M., Kondo, T. and Komoda, M. Cu₂O as a photocatalyst for overall water splitting under visible light irradiation (no date) 'Hara, M., Kondo, T. and Komoda, M. Cu₂O as a photocatalyst for overall water splitting under visible light irradiation.'.
        • Jinlong, Cao; Zhu, Jialing; Liu, Baodong; Li, Yun (2010) 'Research on Operation Technology of Zero Gradient Solar Pond', Proceedings of the EuroSun 2010 Conference, pp. 1-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18086/eurosun.2010.08.08
        • Kanayama, Kimio; Inaba, Hideo; Baba, Hiromu; Fukuda, Takeyuki (1991) 'Experiment and analysis of practical-scale solar pond stabilized with salt gradient', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 353-359. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90050-7
        • Kleis, S.J.; Sanchez, L.A. (1991) 'Dependence of sound velocity on salinity and temperature in saline solutions', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 371-375. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90052-x
        • Leblanc, Jimmy; Andrews, John (2007) 'Low-Temperature Multi-Effect Evaporation Desalination Systems Coupled with Salinity-Gradient Solar Ponds', Proceedings of ISES World Congress 2007 (Vol. I – Vol. V). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 2151-2157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_436
        • Lesino, G.; Saravia, L. (1991) 'Solar ponds in hydrometallurgy and salt production', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 377-382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90053-y
        • Li, Yutong; Lu, Lin; Yang, Hongxing (2010) 'Energy and economic performance analysis of an open cycle solar desiccant dehumidification air-conditioning system for application in Hong Kong', Solar Energy, 84(12), pp. 2085-2095. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.09.006
        • Sinha, A.S.K., Sahu, N. and Arora, M.K (2001) 'Preparation of egg-shell-type Al₂O₃-supported CdS photocatalysts for reduction of H₂O to H₂.'.
        • Smith, M.K.; Newell, T.A. (1991) 'Simulation and economic evaluation of a solar evaporation system for concentrating sodium chloride brines', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 389-399. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90055-2
        • Wang, Fuqiang; Shuai, Yong; Yuan, Yuan; Yang, Guo; Tan, Heping (2010) 'Thermal stress analysis of eccentric tube receiver using concentrated solar radiation', Solar Energy, 84(10), pp. 1809-1815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.005
        • Wilkins, Ebtisam (1991) 'Operation of a commercial solar gel pond', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 383-388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90054-z
        • Zangrando, F. (1991) 'On the hydrodynamics of salt-gradient solar ponds', Solar Energy, 46(6), pp. 323-341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(91)90048-2
        • Zou, Z. and Arakawa, H (2003) 'Direct water splitting into H₂ and O₂ under visible light irradiation with mixed oxide semiconductor photocatalysts.'.

        How to cite this article

        Jinlong, C., Huaiqi, W., Longhao, Z., Junzhe, L. and Junjuan, M. (2026). 'Research on aerial solar pond engineering technology'. Green Technology & Innovation, 2, pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.65582/gti.2026.002

        PreviousEditorial: Advancing Green Technology and Innovation for a Low-Carbon FutureNextBeyond Silicon Valley: Bandung's Ecosystem Approach to Digital Economic Development

        © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Caravel Press.

        Anyone may read, download, copy, distribute and build on this article, in any medium or format, provided the authors and the original article are credited. Read the CC BY 4.0 licence

        ← Green Technology & Innovation

        Also in volume 2

        • EditorialEditorial: Advancing Green Technology and Innovation for a Low-Carbon FutureRiffat, S., Chen, Z., Riffat, J. and Lund, P. · pp. 1-2
        • Technical ArticleBeyond Silicon Valley: Bandung's Ecosystem Approach to Digital Economic DevelopmentKurniadi, K., Rahmah, R., Indrawati, D., Khamilla, A.R., Shafira, A.N., Purmama, H., Ahmad, R., Badruzzaman, B. and Bagali, M. · pp. 25-61
        • Technical ArticleRotary Disc Heat Engine ConceptBenson, C. · pp. 62-75
        • Technical ArticleSelf-powered and self-purifying building envelopes: Progress, challenges, and future perspectivesQian, Y., Ji, J., Xu, S., Gao, Y., Li, Z., Jia, H. and Mu, Y. · pp. 76-101
        • ReviewRecycled Metal Utilization on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Casting AlloysGürkan, D. · pp. 102-112
        • Technical ArticleA desk-based study to determine an optimised greenhouse design bolstering local food production within the UKLim, K.J. and Zheng, X. · pp. 113-149
        All 18 articles

        Green Technology & Innovation

        ISSN 2979-1456
        Edited by Saffa Riffat

        Journal homeAll articlesAll issuesSubmit a paper

        Journals

        • All journals
        • Energy Catalyst
        • Green Technology & Innovation
        • Global Decarbonisation
        • Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Cities
        • Research and Reviews in Sustainability

        Browse

        • All articles
        • New research feed
        • DOI and licence checker
        • The record, for machines

        For authors

        • Submit a manuscript
        • Author guidelines
        • Funder requirements
        • Open access

        Policies

        • Editorial policies
        • Peer review
        • Publication ethics
        • Licensing
        • Research integrity
        • Corrections and retractions

        Services

        • All services
        • Journal hosting
        • Books
        • Conference proceedings
        • navOS, the platform

        Help

        • Support
        • Contact us

        About

        • About Caravel Press
        • Community
        • Societies
        • SDG Publishers Compact

        For reviewers

        • For reviewers
        • Apply to review
        • Check a certificate

        © 2026 Caravel Press. Articles are published open access under CC BY 4.0 and remain the copyright of their authors.

        Privacy|Terms|Accessibility|Site map

        United Kingdom