The increasing electricity demand, propelled by economic expansion and population growth, underscores the critical need for dependable power generation. Steam power plants (SPPs) remain a cornerstone of Indonesia’s electricity production, particularly those fuelled by coal. Energy conservation in SPPs is paramount, focusing on enhancing energy efficiency. However, the current performance assessment, solely based on energy efficiency, overlooks crucial aspects of energy utilization, necessitating a combined approach integrating exergy analysis. This study aims to identify the energy and exergy efficiencies in ultra-supercritical (USC) SPPs, providing management guidelines to prioritize improvement efforts for enhancing thermodynamic efficiency in the XYZ USC SPP system. Previous research has highlighted significant exergy destruction in boilers and turbines. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the energy and exergy analyses at 100%, 75%, and 50% loads on the XYZ USC SPPs unit. The Engineering Equation Solver software was used for the analysis. The power plant efficiencies were 46.94%, 47.01%, and 47.03% at 50%, 75%, and 100% loads. The largest exergy destruction occurred in the boiler, with 1,918 MW at 50% load, 1,609 MW at 75% load, and 1,416 MW at 100% load. The smallest exergy destruction occurred in the condensate extraction pump, with 1.441 MW at 50% load, 1.457 MW at 75% load, and 1.544 MW at 100% load. These findings from the XYZ USC SPP demonstrate that, although the plant achieves competitive energy efficiency levels, substantial opportunities remain for thermodynamic enhancement. The exergy analysis identifies the boiler as the principal source of exergy loss, largely due to inefficiencies in combustion and heat transfer processes. In addition, turbines – particularly the low-pressure turbine – also contribute to significant exergy destruction, warranting targeted optimization efforts.
Nepal R, Paija N. Energy security, electricity, population and economic growth: The case of a developing South Asian resource-rich economy. Energy Policy. 2019;132:771-781. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.054
Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 188.K/HK.02/MEM. L2021tentang Pengesahan Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik PT Perisahaan Listrik Negara (Persero) [Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia Number 188.K/HK.02/MEM.L/2021 on the Approval of the Electricity Supply Business Plan of PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero)]. Indonesia: Kementrian ESDM; 2021.
Fan H, Zhang Z, Dong J, Xu W. China’s R and D of advanced ultra-supercritical coal-fired power generation for addressing climate change. Thermal Sci Eng Prog. 2018;5:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.007
Eguchi S, Takayabu H, Lin C. Sources of inefficient power generation by coal-fired thermal power plants in China: A metafrontier DEA decomposition approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;138:110562. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110562
Zhang C, Wang Z. Comprehensive energy efficiency analysis of ultra-supercritical thermal power units. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;235:121365. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121365
Nikam KC, Kumar R, Jilte R. Exergy and exergo- environmental analysis of a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;145(3):1005-1018. doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-10268-y
Rocha DHD, Siqueira DS, Silva RJ. Effects of coal compositions on the environment and economic feasibility of coal generation technologies. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2021;47:101500. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101500
Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach. Introduction and Basic Concepts. 8th ed., Ch. 1. United States: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
Ersayin E, Ozgener L. Performance analysis of combined cycle power plants: A case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;43:832-842. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.082
Han T, Wang C, Zhu C, Che D. Optimization of waste heat recovery power generation system for cement plant by combining pinch and exergy analysis methods. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;140:334-340. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.039
Chen H, Wang Y, Yan L, Wang Z, He B, Fang B. Energy and exergy analysis on a blast furnace gas-driven cascade power cycle. Energies (Basel). 2022;15(21):8078. doi: 10.3390/en15218078
Khaleel OJ, Basim Ismail F, Khalil Ibrahim T, Bin Abu Hassan SH. Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plants: A comprehensive review on the classification, development, improvements, and configurations. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;13(3):101640. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.009
Adibhatla S, Kaushik SC. Energy and exergy analysis of a super critical thermal power plant at various load conditions under constant and pure sliding pressure operation. Appl Therm Eng. 2014;73(1):51-65. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.07.030
Pambudi NA, Itoi R, Jalilinasrabady S, Jaelani K. Exergy analysis and optimization of Dieng single-Flash geothermal power plant. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;78:405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.073
Kaushik SC, Reddy VS, Tyagi SK. Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(4):1857-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.007
Kumar V, Saxena VK, Kumar R, Kumar S. Energy, exergy, sustainability and environmental emission analysis of coal-fired thermal power plant. Ain Shams Eng J. 2024;15(2):102416. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102416
Abuelnuor AAA, Hassan Suliman MM, Abuelnour MA, Younis O, Mohamed EF. Exergy analysis of the boiler in phase 3 of the Khartoum North power plant. Results Eng. 2024;21:101919. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101919
Khaleel OJ, Ibrahim TK, Ismail FB, Al-Sammarraie AT, Hassan SHBA. Modeling and analysis of optimal performance of a coal-fired power plant based on exergy evaluation. Energy Rep. 2022;8:2179-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.072
Mohamed O, Khalil A, Wang J. Modeling and control of supercritical and ultra-supercritical power plants: A review. Energies (Basel). 2020;13(11):2935. doi: 10.3390/en13112935
Qasem M, Mohamed O, Elhaija WA. Parameter identification and sliding pressure control of a supercritical power plant using whale optimizer. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022;14(13):8039. doi: 10.3390/su14138039
Abe F. Research and development of heat-resistant materials for advanced USC power plants with steam temperatures of 700 °C and above. Engineering. 2015;1(2):211-224. doi: 10.15302/J-ENG-2015031
Klein SA. Engineering Equation Solver. Madison: University of Wisconsin; 2018.
Hasti S, Aroonwilas A, Veawab A. Exergy analysis of ultra super-critical power plant. In: Energy Procedia. Vol. 37. Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.; 2013. p. 2544-2551. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.137
Braimakis K, Magiri-Skouloudi D, Grimekis D, Karellas S. Energy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass- fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling. Renew Energy. 2020;154:252-269. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.091
Chen C, Bollas GM. Dynamic optimization of a subcritical steam power plant under time-varying power load. Processes. 2018;6(8):114. doi: 10.3390/pr6080114
Karakurt AS, Güneş Ü. Performance Analysis of a Steam Turbine Power Plant at Part Load Conditions. Vol. 3. Turkey: Yildiz Technical University Press; 2017.
Napitu PYG, Setiyana B. Net plant heat rate (NPHR) analysis of main plant boiler unit (UIK) towards coal additive corint PC 99 injection. Int Res J Innovat Eng Technol (IRJIET). 2022;6(8):31-35. doi: 10.47001/IRJIET/2022.608005
How to cite this article
Izzah, F.N., Kiono, B.F.T. and Rozi, K. (2025). 'Energy and exergy analysis of the XYZ ultra-supercritical steam power plant'. Green Technology & Innovation, 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.36922/gti.8099
Check for updates