Efficient energy utilization is essential for the performance of solar-powered electric vehicles, especially for achieving extended range in competitive settings such as the World Solar Challenge (WSC25). This 3,000 km race from Darwin to Adelaide, Australia, presents unique challenges, particularly regarding efficiently capturing solar energy using a 6 m2 panel area. Factors such as the type of solar cells, their orientation, and the photovoltaic (PV) arrangement in clusters mapped to maximum power point tracking systems play significant roles in energy efficiency. This study examines the shading effects encountered during WSC25 on a vehicle measuring 5.5 m in length, 1.6 m in width, and 1 m in height, with a drag coefficient of 0.0973. We assessed the impact of shading on energy generation and vehicle performance. By analyzing solar irradiance along the race route using Hotell’s clear-day model, we aimed to optimize the roof angle of the solar panels to enhance energy absorption. The vehicle was equipped with a 3.35 kWh battery and 1.32 kWh solar panels, rated under standard test conditions. We also identified areas prone to shading that may affect the overall energy yield, utilizing Blender for visualization. A comprehensive energy audit was conducted to quantify power losses associated with shading and other factors influencing vehicle performance. Furthermore, we explored potential strategies to mitigate these losses and improve overall energy input, including the use of bypass diodes in specific shadow-affected regions. Our findings show that the use of half-cut solar cells in shaded regions can enhance energy generation by 3% compared to the best-performing full-cut cell cluster under similar shading conditions. These insights offer valuable guidance for the design of solar vehicles and the development of race strategies for teams competing in solar endurance challenges worldwide.
Keywords. Energy audit; Shadow effect; Solar energy maximization; Solar vehicle; World Solar Challenge
References
Veerapen S, Wen H. Shadowing Effect on the Power Output of a Photovoltaic Panel. In: 2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC- ECCE Asia). United States: IEEE; 2016. p. 3508-3513. doi: 10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512858
Du J, Xu R, Chen X, Li Y, Wu J. A Novel Solar Panel Optimizer with Self-Compensation for Partial Shadow Condition. In: 2013 Twenty-Eighth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC). 2013. p. 92-96. doi: 10.1109/APEC.2013.6520190
Kazem HA, Chaichan MT, Alwaeli AH, Mani K. Effect of Shadows on the Performance of Solar Photovoltaic. Germany: Springer eBooks; 2016. p. 379-385. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6-27
Ku J, Kim SM, Park HD. Energy-saving path planning navigation for solar-powered vehicles considering shadows. Renew Energy. 2024;236:121424. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121424
Brito MC, Santos T, Moura F, Pera D, Rocha J. Urban solar potential for vehicle integrated photovoltaics. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2021;94:102810. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102810
Birnie DP 3rd. Analysis of energy capture by vehicle solar roofs in conjunction with workplace plug-in charging. Solar Energy. 2016;125:219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.014
ElMenshawy M, ElMenshawy M, Massoud A, Gastli A. Solar car efficient power converters’ design. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE). United States: IEEE; 2016. p. 177-182. doi: 10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575059
Hottel HC. A simple model for estimating the transmittance of direct solar radiation through clear atmospheres. Solar Energy. 1976;18(2):129-134. doi: 10.1016/0038-092x(76)90045-1
Islahi A, Shakil S, Hamed M. Hottel’s clear day model for a typical arid city-Jeddah. Int J Eng Sci Invent. 2015;4:32-37.
Kassem Kh O. Estimation of clear-sky global solar radiation using hottel’s model and Liu and Jordan’s model for Qena/ Egypt. Res Environ. 2021;11(1):9-17. doi: 10.5923.j.re.20211101.02
Liu BYH, Jordan RC. The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation. Solar Energy. 1960;4(3):1-19. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(60)90062-1
Mateja K, Skarka W, Drygała A. Efficiency decreases in a laminated solar cell developed for a UAV. Materials. 2022;15(24):8774. doi: 10.3390/ma15248774
Elmar. Elmar Solar Race MPPT Datasheet; 2021. Available from: https://docs.prohelion.com/MPPTs/pdfs/Elmar%20 Solar%20MPPT%20Race%202021.pdf
Hasyim ES, Wenham SR, Green MA. Shadow tolerance of modules incorporating integral bypass diode solar cells. Solar Cells. 1986;19(2):109-122. doi: 10.1016/0379-6787(86)90036-0
Silvestre S, Boronat A, Chouder A. Study of bypass diodes configuration on PV modules. Appl Energy. 2009;86(9):1632-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.01.020
Spreafico C, Sutrisno A. Artificial intelligence assisted social failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for sustainable product design. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8678. doi: 10.3390/su15118678
How to cite this article
Kaneria, P. and Reddy, K.S. (2025). 'Minimizing shadow effects to optimize solar energy input in the World Solar Challenge'. Green Technology & Innovation, 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.36922/GTI025090004
