Evaluation of operation control parameters of a residential solar organic Rankine cycle with effects of expander-generator coupling
, , , , ,
1School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK
2Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarsus University, 33400, Mersin, Turkey
3Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
4Department of Engineering, University of Ferrara, 44122, Ferrara, Italy
Solar-powered organic Rankine cycles (s-ORCs) are promising technologies for converting solar radiation into electrical energy, offering a viable alternative to conventional photovoltaics. However, the intermittent nature of solar radiation presents operational challenges, as these systems cannot regulate their heat input and rely entirely on solar energy availability. This study investigates the transient performance of a small-scale s-ORC system without thermal energy storage, focusing on how operational parameters influence system behaviour under variable solar conditions. A simulation model is developed, integrating effectiveness–NTU-based heat exchanger models and a validated expander–generator coupling sub-model that accounts for real-world responses such as torque balance, rotational speed, and internal leakage. Key control parameters, including the flow rates of the refrigerant, cooling water, and thermal oil, are examined to assess their influence on overall performance. The results show that solar heat input is the dominant factor affecting system efficiency, followed by the cooling water flow rate, which has a more significant impact than thermal oil flow. Based on a one-day simulation, the expander’s volumetric efficiency was found to average around 60% due to leakage losses, and the expander predominantly operated under off-design conditions. The generator efficiency varied between 49% and 58%, with lower rotational speeds resulting in better conversion efficiency.
Keywords. Solar ORC; Scroll expander; Transient response; Operation control
References
J. Wang, Z. Yan, P. Zhao, and Y. Dai, “Off-design performance analysis of a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 80, p. 150–157, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.032.
C. Kutlu, J. Li, Y. Su, Y. Wang, G. Pei, and S. Riffat, “Investigation of an innovative PV/T-ORC system using amorphous silicon cells and evacuated flat plate solar collectors,” Energy, vol. 203, p. 117873, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117873.
J. Sun and B. Peng, “Experimental study on steady-state operation of organic Rankine cycle system under different operating conditions,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84813-2.
J. C. Hsieh, Y. H. Chen, and Y. C. Hsieh, “Experimental study of an organic Rankine cycle with a variable-rotational-speed scroll expander at various heat source temperatures,” Energy, vol. 270, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126956.
F. Fatigati, M. Di Bartolomeo, and R. Cipollone, “Model-based optimisation of solar-assisted ORC- based power unit for domestic micro-cogeneration,” Energy, vol. 308, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132785.
P. Vitte, F. Manenti, S. Pierucci, X. Joulia, and G. Buzzi-Ferraris, “Dynamic simulation of concentrating solar plants,” Chem Eng Trans, vol. 29, p. 235–240, 2012, doi: 10.3303/CET1229040.
F. Manenti and Z. Ravaghi-Ardebili, “Dynamic simulation of concentrating solar power plant and two- tanks direct thermal energy storage,” Energy, vol. 55, p. 89–97, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.001.
B. El Hefni, “Dynamic modeling of concentrated solar power plants with the ThermoSysPro library (Parabolic Trough collectors, Fresnel reflector and Solar-Hybrid),” Energy Procedia, vol. 49, p. 1127–1137, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.122.
S. Daniarta, M. Nemś, and P. Kolasiński, “A review on thermal energy storage applicable for low- and medium-temperature organic Rankine cycle,” Sep. 01, 2023, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127931.
Z. Guo, J. Wang, F. Dong, and H. Xu, “Multi-objective optimization of multi-energy complementary system based on cascade utilization of heat storage,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 299, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117864.
S. Baghaei Oskouei et al., “Solar-powered hybrid energy storage system with phase change materials,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 302, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118117.
A. Saxena et al., “A thermodynamic review on solar ponds,” Solar Energy, vol. 242, p. 335–363, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.016.
G. Kosmadakis, D. Manolakos, and G. Papadakis, “Experimental investigation of a lowerature organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engine under variable heat input operating at both subcritical and supercritical conditions,” Appl Therm Eng, vol. 92, p. 1–7, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.082.
R. Dickes, O. Dumont, R. Daccord, S. Quoilin, and V. Lemort, “Modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems in off-design conditions : An experimentally-validated comparative study,” Energy, vol. 123, p. 710–727, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.130.
D. Ziviani et al., “Optimizing the performance of small-scale organic Rankine cycle that utilizes a single-screw expander,” Appl Energy, vol. 189, p. 416–432, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.070.
M. Read, I. Smith, N. Stosic, and A. Kovacevic, “Comparison of organic rankine cycle systems under varying conditions using turbine and twin-screw expanders,” Energies (Basel), vol. 9, no. 8, 2016, doi: 10.3390/en9080614.
K. Yang et al., “Performance analysis of the vehicle diesel Engine-ORC combined system based on a screw expander,” Energies (Basel), vol. 7, no. 5, p. 3400–3419, 2014, doi: 10.3390/en7053400.
P. Collings, A. McKeown, E. Wang, and Z. Yu, “Experimental investigation of a small-scale orc power plant using a positive displacement expander with and without a regenerator,” Energies (Basel), vol. 12, no. 8, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12081452.
A. R. Imre, S. Daniarta, P. Błasiak, and P. Kolasiński, “Design, Integration, and Control of Organic Rankine Cycles with Thermal Energy Storage and Two-Phase Expansion System Utilizing Intermittent and Fluctuating Heat Sources—A Review,” Aug. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/en16165948.
C. Kutlu et al., “Evaluate the validity of the empirical correlations of clearance and friction coefficients to improve a scroll expander semi-empirical model,” Energy, vol. 202, p. 117723, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117723.
J. Li, G. Gao, P. Li, G. Pei, H. Huang, and Y. Su, “Experimental study of organic Rankine cycle in the presence of non- condensable gases,” Energy, vol. 142, p. 739–753, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.054.
J. Li, P. Li, G. Pei, J. Z. Alvi, and J. Ji, “Analysis of a novel solar electricity generation system using cascade Rankine cycle and steam screw expander,” Appl Energy, vol. 165, p. 627–638, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.087.
A. Ehtiwesh, C. Kutlu, Y. Su, and S. Riffat, “Modelling and performance evaluation of a direct steam generation solar power system coupled with steam accumulator to meet electricity demands for a hospital under typical climate conditions in Libya,” Renew Energy, vol. 206, p. 795–807, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.075.
C. Kutlu, M. Tahir, J. Li, Y. Wang, and Y. Su, “A study on heat storage sizing and fl ow control for a domestic scale solar-powered organic Rankine cycle-vapour compression refrigeration system,” Renew Energy, vol. 143, p. 301–312, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.017.
V. Lemort, S. Quoilin, C. Cuevas, and J. Lebrun, “Testing and modeling a scroll expander inte- grated into an Organic Rankine Cycle,” Appl Therm Eng, vol. 29, no. 14–15, p. 3094–3102, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.04.013.
How to cite this article
Kutlu, C., Erdinc, M.T., Ehtiwesh, A., Bottarelli, M., Su, Y. and Riffat, S. (2025). 'Evaluation of operation control parameters of a residential solar organic Rankine cycle with effects of expander-generator coupling'. Global Decarbonisation, 1, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.9437
Check for updates